Search
Latest topics
» Leighton vs Bristow & Sutor high court ruling. 'enforcement agent' needed to supply a legally executed liability order to prove any authority.by wakey wakey Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:01 pm
» Brandon Joe Williams
by grams Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:29 am
» A Parcel sent to me worth 99p ! Court Claim received !
by memegirl777 Sun Nov 03, 2024 4:53 pm
» UK Courts Using Faulty Cell Site Data a Serious Concern!!
by midnight Sun Nov 03, 2024 1:32 pm
» Clowells continue
by Biggiebest Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:47 am
» Legal responsibility
by Biggiebest Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:36 pm
» Composting Leaves
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:25 am
» Composting
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:22 am
» BEWARE OF TSB BANK
by daveiron Sun Oct 27, 2024 4:04 am
» Council Tax
by Lopsum Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:57 pm
» Salary Finance
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:56 am
» DWP
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:49 am
» Real Electric Cars
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:53 am
» BOMBSHELL: Slovakia could BAN mRNA vaccines
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:40 am
» Council Tax (getting answers)
by assassin Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:22 pm
» DSAR DELAYS
by daveiron Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:20 pm
» For those considering ,conditional acceptance
by daveiron Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:55 am
» Just got a letter
by daveiron Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:46 pm
» Ceder so called bailiffs
by Ian4644 Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:43 pm
» Our Little Food Growing Experiment
by assassin Fri Sep 27, 2024 5:01 am
» Jocabs Threatening my parents address over council tax.
by darkfireblade Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:42 pm
» Heat Your Home
by assassin Mon Sep 23, 2024 3:48 am
» Purchased Used car, thew con rod after 4 weeks, 40,000mi on clock, can we get out of the finance?
by scrwm Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:56 pm
» ULEZ London huge fine for misunderstanding
by urchinatheart Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 pm
» The new ruling, lie-ability order
by assassin Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:19 am
» Prepping 1 Lighting Overview
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:34 am
» Prepping 2 Selecting Light Sources
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:26 am
» Prepping 3 Security
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:21 am
» Prepping 4 Planning Your Lighting
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:18 am
» Prepping 5 Charging Your Batteries
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:15 am
» An idea to reform the police ?
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:02 am
» Post 2007 CCA
by Biggiebest Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:47 pm
» Travel advice please: London to Amsterdam no injects no tests
by Kaddabriol Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:39 am
» CCJ letter
by waylander62 Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:12 pm
» Disability
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 3:03 am
» It works (Richard Vobes)
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 2:57 am
» Veronica Chapmans approach to CT
by daveiron Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:17 pm
» Tsb many times refused basic account
by flyingfish Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:53 am
» Lowell New Address
by waylander62 Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:41 pm
» The Daily Mail doesn't know the law on facemasks and disability -ThatguyScottWeb
by Emma78 Mon Aug 26, 2024 9:29 am
» DSAR from OC
by waylander62 Mon Aug 19, 2024 8:46 pm
» HSBC advice please.
by Trishiapp28 Thu Aug 15, 2024 6:30 pm
» Council Tax Notice of Enforcement
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:26 pm
» If The State is Pushing You to Riot , Do the Reverse
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:16 pm
» Grid Down Mistakes To Avoid
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:05 am
» Grid Down Realities
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:57 am
» Lowest of Lowest continue with their fraud
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:09 am
» Government Prepping Food and Water
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:07 am
» Subject access dca refused
by daveiron Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:14 am
» Pre action protocol
by Biggiebest Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:40 am
» DCA working on behalf of an energy company
by daveiron Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:45 pm
» More of the Same
by daveiron Sun Jul 21, 2024 12:19 am
» Off Grid Engine Projects
by assassin Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:03 am
» Government Prepping Setting Up
by urchinatheart Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:13 am
» Latest from CrimeBodge
by assassin Tue Jul 16, 2024 4:15 am
Moon phases
Court Scam
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Court Scam
We appear to have a court scam which affects us all and this is that despite being required to notify all interested parties in any case, many courts are not notifying defendants in a large number of cases, and many of these are where the po-lice have been accused of a number of illegal actions; yet they still notify the CPS, po-lice, and any other witnesses for the prosecution but often not the defendant and a number of key defence witnesses, so why is this alarming and which courts are doing this.
In many cases it is the magistrates courts which do this, but an alarming trend has shown up where a magistrates court has foung someone guilty and it is put to appeal in the Crown court the defendant is not often notified, so why is this? if you appeal you are supposed to have another full hearing and the crown courts dont want this as it risks exposing the po-lice as the liars they really are and this is another fraudulent method of covering it up and getting a default judgement upholding the original and often incorrect verdict. In many cases these appeals are heard before a district judge and two magistrates, so no nepotism there then, and if we consider that both the magistrates and crown courts are a private company and comprise these and the tribunals service to form a company called HMCTS which are registered in Leek, Staffs.
In a recent case the DWP trading as Jobcentre Plus have been assessing the disabled and they employed private contractors such as Cr*pita and other companies to undertake these assessments as non medical assessments and Cr*pita has admitted they were given targets by the DWP to hit which were to disqualify a specific percentage of disabled claimants and to do this all the contractors employed fraudulent practices and have been caught out doing so, and then admitted this is what they were doing and actually gave specific numbers of people they were to disqualify.
In a huge number of these cases many people appealed the decisions and it went to tribunals and the DWP were having cases overturned on a ratio of about 2:1 and in a huge number of these cases the claimant who was the defendant was never notified about these cases and could not attend and the cases were heard in absentia where the tribunals overturned the DWP's decision and reinstated the claimants benefits.
In many cases it is the magistrates courts which do this, but an alarming trend has shown up where a magistrates court has foung someone guilty and it is put to appeal in the Crown court the defendant is not often notified, so why is this? if you appeal you are supposed to have another full hearing and the crown courts dont want this as it risks exposing the po-lice as the liars they really are and this is another fraudulent method of covering it up and getting a default judgement upholding the original and often incorrect verdict. In many cases these appeals are heard before a district judge and two magistrates, so no nepotism there then, and if we consider that both the magistrates and crown courts are a private company and comprise these and the tribunals service to form a company called HMCTS which are registered in Leek, Staffs.
In a recent case the DWP trading as Jobcentre Plus have been assessing the disabled and they employed private contractors such as Cr*pita and other companies to undertake these assessments as non medical assessments and Cr*pita has admitted they were given targets by the DWP to hit which were to disqualify a specific percentage of disabled claimants and to do this all the contractors employed fraudulent practices and have been caught out doing so, and then admitted this is what they were doing and actually gave specific numbers of people they were to disqualify.
In a huge number of these cases many people appealed the decisions and it went to tribunals and the DWP were having cases overturned on a ratio of about 2:1 and in a huge number of these cases the claimant who was the defendant was never notified about these cases and could not attend and the cases were heard in absentia where the tribunals overturned the DWP's decision and reinstated the claimants benefits.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3634
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Court Scam
I find it rather interesting that the title of this thread is: Court Scam, why? Because we all tend to miss something important beginning with the fact that everything is run as a corporation for profit.
This being so, surely the courts, the police, HMRC etc, etc are all operating outside their remit and the legislation/statutes which are the laws by which they are all bound to follow, but don't. In other words they are all acting fraudulently from the beginning to the end.
This being so, surely the courts, the police, HMRC etc, etc are all operating outside their remit and the legislation/statutes which are the laws by which they are all bound to follow, but don't. In other words they are all acting fraudulently from the beginning to the end.
landlubber- news worthy
- Posts : 156
Join date : 2017-01-31
Re: Court Scam
Very true LL, but nothing is being done about it.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3634
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Court Scam
If these people are companies and it can be proven then it should be possible to argue that being a private busienss, that they have no power issue penalties because they just do not have the judical power to do so.
Have these people been vested with the power of a court?
Corporations are dead entities and have no jurisdiction over the living so I cannot see how they can have the judical power to fine or prosecute people.
Have these people been vested with the power of a court?
Corporations are dead entities and have no jurisdiction over the living so I cannot see how they can have the judical power to fine or prosecute people.
Ausk- Moderator
- Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03
Re: Court Scam
I agree, Ausk. In accepting money when judging people who appear in their courts, they are no longer acting impartially. To me, each and every one of these corporations is acting treasonously towards the people and they are guilty by their actions plain and simple.
The question is: what can be done about it? Since governments are also implied, they are just as guilty by their silence and accepting to do nothing even though they are totally aware of what is going on.
landlubber- news worthy
- Posts : 156
Join date : 2017-01-31
Re: Court Scam
landlubber wrote:
I agree, Ausk. In accepting money when judging people who appear in their courts, they are no longer acting impartially. To me, each and every one of these corporations is acting treasonously towards the people and they are guilty by their actions plain and simple.
The question is: what can be done about it? Since governments are also implied, they are just as guilty by their silence and accepting to do nothing even though they are totally aware of what is going on.
Perhaps someone might choose to ask these people to explain from what authority do they claim to have the power to sit as a court. I,e, what law are they relying on for their power.
Ask,what government, when and under what law were they vested with the power of a court to sit in judgement of this matter and impose penalties and issue fines?
A follow up conditional acceptance of their claim might be: I will accept your claim upon documentary proof claim you have the constitutional, legal and lawful power to act as a court of the realm, to levy fines and impose penalties on me. I see no such proof in front of me.
Ausk- Moderator
- Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03
Re: Court Scam
handle wrote:If they are companies, who are the PSC's listed at conpanies house
(Persons of Significant Control)
No they aren't, many corporations set up by Governments and their cronies are under a crown exemption variant, in such cases they DO NOT have to be registered by Companies House and looking at it will show nothing, much better to use a foreign company registration company which covers UK registered companies to identify those not listed on Companies House.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3634
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Court Scam
assassin wrote:much better to use a foreign company registration company which covers UK registered companies to identify those not listed on Companies House.
can you recommend a couple, still unable to find out where powys magistrates court is registered, not that i dig into it too often. On another note, it has been confirmed by the court manager at merthyr that the court identification number cannot be shared or assigned to another court. Is this another scam? powys magistrates court using llandrindod wells magistrates court number #3351. Perhaps it was human error though and the clerk of the court forgot where she was.
Still not listed btw https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/courts/P
El E Mentary- Not so newb
- Posts : 86
Join date : 2017-10-17
Re: Court Scam
Dunn and Bradstreet are a good one to use.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3634
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Court Scam
assassin wrote:Dunn and Bradstreet are a good one to use.
tried them before as with a few others each and every time keep getting the same results The company you are searching for cannot be found. I wouldn't be surprised if powys magistrates court is registered as a company in Puerto Rico, an enigma for sure.
El E Mentary- Not so newb
- Posts : 86
Join date : 2017-10-17
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum