My property

by living man 01 Fri Jun 02, 2017 9:24 pm

Hi, Just like to no, if the children does not belong to me to the state? Because of the birth certificate. Its not my children, it is my property? Does this work for boats as well? If so why leigh & the feller from liverpool not use this? I think leigh used this to the scum bags but why it not work? Cheers.

by **LionsShare** Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:07 pm

my god is the beer that strong?

by **LionsShare** Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:26 pm

please ask why the beer being so strong - will explain

by andybreck Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:30 pm

home brew

by **LionsShare** Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:38 pm

I simply imagined the narrative spoken in a certain way

by andybreck Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:40 pm

by living man 01 Sat Jun 03, 2017 1:04 am

Check out Karl Lenz interview on uk column news. The only man on this planet that has got to get to see a high court judge @ the high court @ 6.30pm. Just check the interview out. This is why the scum gov are stealing lots of kids & the parents are not getting them back. Because the parents use the word, MY children, Just check the vid out & ya no we learn something everyday. Do ya home work. JUSTICE FOR CHELSEY. Cheers lol.

by Waffle Sat Jun 03, 2017 9:44 am

Like I keep saying everything is land and property, you me your debts everything! All children are a ward of a very specific aspect of the state.

by landlubber Sat Jun 03, 2017 9:52 am

If a child, a human being, can be taken by the government agents, then this is a child taken into slavery. Think about that...

by living man 01 Sat Jun 03, 2017 10:29 am

Yes, I no that, but the wording is not the same as we no it today. Check out Karl Lenz interview on uk column news. Cheers.

by **daveiron** Sat Jun 03, 2017 3:46 pm

Hi living man 01

If you want to see all the arguements for and against Karl lentz check the old site in latest news section ,it must be the longest thread on the site ,well over 100 pages if i remember correctly

by living man 01 Sat Jun 03, 2017 9:50 pm

Hi daveiron,

Just been looking on the old site in latest news & there is 839 topic pagers wow. Going to take me for every to find it wow. Would be nice to find it tho.

by Guest Sat Jun 03, 2017 10:09 pm

Hi living man 01

Gonna make your day - google this, re: Karl lentz

Click on 'if you are in court'

You're welcome....

Cheers!

by living man 01 Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:00 pm

hi iamani,

Cheers m8. Will look later. I was just interested if it would work. But i suppose not, because Leigh & Scouse have got the best team around them. But by the sounds of things this Karl Lenz no good. hahahahaha.

Cheers....

by StrangerInAStrangeLand Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:17 pm

Karl Lentz has lost every case he's been involved in.

by living man 01 Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:59 am

Cheers,

just goggled his name & he a rat wow. To good to be true hay hahahahaha. He very good at blagging & he blagged me. Not for money, but just for knowledge. Always thought that 1 about the child & property would work, but thought, why Brain (uk column) not use it for The Doherty Family. Use it & stop all the pain they going through. All I needed to do was google his name wow hahahhahaha.
Cheers...

by Waffle Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:00 am

He's not wrong. Every infant is a ward of a very specific aspect of the state. The wards guardians administer 3 areas of protection for the infant, person, property and the infant itself. Therefore the infant is property of the guardian, if it wasn't the guardian would have no jurisdiction to provide those forms of protection on behalf of the sovereign.

They don't like Karl Lentz because as soon as they get any usher of freeman they are labelled as an anarchist against the system, ergo do anything to protect the beloved sovereign. Its fucking bullshit, we're all out here trying to help each other because the very entity that is supposed to protect us doesn't and wont, they are just shutting down every avenue we have.

by teddy2 Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:13 am

well put waffle, i was just watching vid, the paper is not signed and all "courts" are frauds .
there going to slam down any code breakers to their game.
open minds , the divide and conquer tactics at play
"the judge dale" also rebuked by many yet has served
well. you guys aint wrong posting the content yet until we try it ourselves its hearsay. peace

by living man 01 Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:05 am

There was a case the other week, about a family who wonted their baby to go to usa, for life saving treatment, but the hospital said no. The family were in court & the judge, decided the child belongs to the hospital, not much clued up over this case. The baby was on life support & i think the hospital switched the machine of, not to sure. I think it mite of been in Liverpool? The parents come out & said their baby belongs to the hospital. So sad but true.

by Ausk Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:15 am

living man 01 wrote:Cheers,

just goggled his name & he a rat wow. To good to be true hay hahahahaha. He very good at blagging & he blagged me. Not for money, but just for knowledge. Always thought that 1 about the child & property would work, but thought, why Brain (uk column) not use it for The Doherty Family. Use it & stop all the pain they going through. All I needed to do was google his name wow hahahhahaha.
Cheers...

I have no issue with your comments.

The trouble is, for me, as i see it, is that despite the way things are supposed to be, even the courts are in the business either wilingly or unwilingly, protecting the system and keeping the numbers of people who know the knowlledge to an absolute minimum.

He may have been found guility to isolate and discredit what he says, so that followers will turn away from him, when all along he was right.

Judges in Australia do this. According to the Australian Commonwalth Constiution, the rules of the supreme court are supposed to be approved by the Senate, the upper house at national level.

It took a new politician (a wheat farmer) from the bush to bring this up in court when the judges and all the lawyers in Parliament and all the attorneys Gernal etc, have known this for decades but said and done nothing. As a result of this, this bloke was taken STRAGIHT to the High court and bankrupted over a $10 truck key which he took from his own truck when he was foreclosed on. He took the key out of the truck and refused to give it to the sheriff.

Talk about a vexacioius litigant, never even went to a magistrates court.

For being bankrupt he was thrown out of the Senate and his seat given to someone else.

by living man 01 Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:37 am

I no what you saying, but why as no 1 used the child & property thing. Stop the scum from stealing the kids from there parents? Why brain (uk column) not used this with the Dohortey family. Brain new how to use this property thing, because it was on his show. I take back the words if I offended any 1 by my earlier posts but just what I read on google hahahha, 2 sides to a story.

Cheers....

by living man 01 Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:50 am

Hi, Just found the case were the judge decided against the parents. Would of been nice to use my property on this sad case.

Doctors can withdraw life-support treatment from a sick baby boy against his parents’ wishes, a high court judge has ruled.

Specialists at Great Ormond Street hospital (GOSH) in central London had told the court they believed it was time to stop providing life support for eight-month-old Charlie Gard, who has a rare genetic condition.

Doctors treating the infant say he has brain damage and should be moved on to a palliative care regime. His parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, of Bedfont, west London, wanted to take him to a hospital in the US for a treatment trial.

On Tuesday, Mr Justice Francis said: “It is with the heaviest of hearts but with complete conviction for Charlie’s best interests that I find it is in Charlie’s best interests that I accede to these applications and rule that GOSH may lawfully withdraw all treatment save for palliative care to permit Charlie to die with dignity.”

As he spoke, Gard buried his head in his hands and cried “no” as other family members broke down. Charlie’s parents are considering mounting an appeal.

The judge praised Charlie’s parents “for their brave and dignified campaign on his behalf” and “their absolute dedication to their wonderful boy from the day that he was born”.

by Waffle Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:20 pm

Hey living man you haven't offended anyone, its more so just pointing out truths that are often not seen at first. Not all of the gurus' methods work but usually their intention is to support us and without them out their spreading the word and getting the high view counts most of us would be unaware and unable to develop the knowledge. The system know this which is why it labels people frauds etc, jesus christ was nailed to the cross, Ghandi imprisoned, Mandela imprisoned, my point being is that just because their is a label it doesn't mean someone is a bad guy, but we have to use our own critical thinking and judgment wen using their material for our own purposes.

It is a very sad state of affairs the saddest when a parent has their parental responsibilities stripped and the decisions made for them, not many more so than in the case you published, because of its ultimate consequences.

by living man 01 Wed Jun 07, 2017 5:59 pm

Hi Waffle, Cheers for the reply m8. If we no about this, why dont we use it? Brain had the chance to use it & hasn't. We get told these things & we must try them, to see if it works? I would love to no the reason why brain never used it. But probley wont. Only time will tell I suppose.
Cheers.

by Sponsored content

My property

My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property

Re: My property