Search
Latest topics
» Leighton vs Bristow & Sutor high court ruling. 'enforcement agent' needed to supply a legally executed liability order to prove any authority.by wakey wakey Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:01 pm
» Brandon Joe Williams
by grams Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:29 am
» A Parcel sent to me worth 99p ! Court Claim received !
by memegirl777 Sun Nov 03, 2024 4:53 pm
» UK Courts Using Faulty Cell Site Data a Serious Concern!!
by midnight Sun Nov 03, 2024 1:32 pm
» Clowells continue
by Biggiebest Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:47 am
» Legal responsibility
by Biggiebest Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:36 pm
» Composting Leaves
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:25 am
» Composting
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:22 am
» BEWARE OF TSB BANK
by daveiron Sun Oct 27, 2024 4:04 am
» Council Tax
by Lopsum Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:57 pm
» Salary Finance
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:56 am
» DWP
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:49 am
» Real Electric Cars
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:53 am
» BOMBSHELL: Slovakia could BAN mRNA vaccines
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:40 am
» Council Tax (getting answers)
by assassin Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:22 pm
» DSAR DELAYS
by daveiron Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:20 pm
» For those considering ,conditional acceptance
by daveiron Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:55 am
» Just got a letter
by daveiron Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:46 pm
» Ceder so called bailiffs
by Ian4644 Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:43 pm
» Our Little Food Growing Experiment
by assassin Fri Sep 27, 2024 5:01 am
» Jocabs Threatening my parents address over council tax.
by darkfireblade Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:42 pm
» Heat Your Home
by assassin Mon Sep 23, 2024 3:48 am
» Purchased Used car, thew con rod after 4 weeks, 40,000mi on clock, can we get out of the finance?
by scrwm Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:56 pm
» ULEZ London huge fine for misunderstanding
by urchinatheart Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 pm
» The new ruling, lie-ability order
by assassin Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:19 am
» Prepping 1 Lighting Overview
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:34 am
» Prepping 2 Selecting Light Sources
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:26 am
» Prepping 3 Security
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:21 am
» Prepping 4 Planning Your Lighting
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:18 am
» Prepping 5 Charging Your Batteries
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:15 am
» An idea to reform the police ?
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:02 am
» Post 2007 CCA
by Biggiebest Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:47 pm
» Travel advice please: London to Amsterdam no injects no tests
by Kaddabriol Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:39 am
» CCJ letter
by waylander62 Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:12 pm
» Disability
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 3:03 am
» It works (Richard Vobes)
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 2:57 am
» Veronica Chapmans approach to CT
by daveiron Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:17 pm
» Tsb many times refused basic account
by flyingfish Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:53 am
» Lowell New Address
by waylander62 Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:41 pm
» The Daily Mail doesn't know the law on facemasks and disability -ThatguyScottWeb
by Emma78 Mon Aug 26, 2024 9:29 am
» DSAR from OC
by waylander62 Mon Aug 19, 2024 8:46 pm
» HSBC advice please.
by Trishiapp28 Thu Aug 15, 2024 6:30 pm
» Council Tax Notice of Enforcement
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:26 pm
» If The State is Pushing You to Riot , Do the Reverse
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:16 pm
» Grid Down Mistakes To Avoid
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:05 am
» Grid Down Realities
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:57 am
» Lowest of Lowest continue with their fraud
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:09 am
» Government Prepping Food and Water
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:07 am
» Subject access dca refused
by daveiron Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:14 am
» Pre action protocol
by Biggiebest Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:40 am
» DCA working on behalf of an energy company
by daveiron Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:45 pm
» More of the Same
by daveiron Sun Jul 21, 2024 12:19 am
» Off Grid Engine Projects
by assassin Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:03 am
» Government Prepping Setting Up
by urchinatheart Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:13 am
» Latest from CrimeBodge
by assassin Tue Jul 16, 2024 4:15 am
Moon phases
"HELP" with Human rights
+6
Lopsum
Boudica
Little D
Jinxer
daveiron
living man 01
10 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: "HELP" with Human rights
This case is Bulls**t
Would the OC kindly inform us of the actual charge
They have no Corpus Delectii
They have no Actus Rea
Its doubtful they even have the Mens Rea or animus (as that has been publically expunged)
What they do have is an ACCOUNT and a PERSON deemed in their society to have duties and obligations (think and act as we find to be useful), they will refer to this as strict liability, or a strict liability offence... this only makes sense when you see the trust structure they are deploying against on you.
What they are looking to construct when they get the Defendant in their venue is a constructive trust or an artificial legal mechanism to complete an otherwise inchoate relationship (the Barrister is their to facilitate this too).
Step back into your proper person and capacity and call them out at the Disclosure phase and you will see just how full of it these people are.
Would the OC kindly inform us of the actual charge
They have no Corpus Delectii
They have no Actus Rea
Its doubtful they even have the Mens Rea or animus (as that has been publically expunged)
What they do have is an ACCOUNT and a PERSON deemed in their society to have duties and obligations (think and act as we find to be useful), they will refer to this as strict liability, or a strict liability offence... this only makes sense when you see the trust structure they are deploying against on you.
What they are looking to construct when they get the Defendant in their venue is a constructive trust or an artificial legal mechanism to complete an otherwise inchoate relationship (the Barrister is their to facilitate this too).
Step back into your proper person and capacity and call them out at the Disclosure phase and you will see just how full of it these people are.
Last edited by assassin on Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:23 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Language)
Candor- news worthy
- Posts : 147
Join date : 2017-07-20
Re: "HELP" with Human rights
Thanks for the replies. It was videoed in his own home. If any 1 can tell me how to share the video of him, what he said I could do. But mite upset some people.
Cheers....
Cheers....
living man 01- news worthy
- Posts : 126
Join date : 2017-05-29
Re: "HELP" with Human rights
Hi, Just found this from are local paper.
A man who allegedly went on a racist rant about blowing up mosques is trying to get the case against him thrown out.
Paul Hepplestall was arrested after the video nasty was widely shared online in the wake of recent terror attacks blighting the UK.
The 39-year-old is charged with ‘intending to cause harassment, alarm of distress used threatening abusive or insulting language and was wholly or partly motivated to do so by hostility towards members of a particular racial group.’
A second charge, under the Criminal Damages Act, alleges that Hepplestall, “threatened to destroy or damage property, namely mosques belonging to others”.
But his barrister, Lloyd Morgan, today said he would be putting forward an application to dismiss both charges against Hepplestall.
That 90-minute hearing will take place at the end of September at Liverpool Crown Court.
READ MORE
Man alleged to have made anti Muslim rant video brands charges "a shambles"
A date for a trial was still scheduled for October, and is expected to last up to four days.
Hepplestall appeared via video-link from HMP Liverpool. Wearing a white T-shirt, he spoke only to confirm his name.
It is alleged that Hepplestall, of Cornwallis Street, in Liverpool, was featured on a video which showed a man with a bladed weapon discussing the recent atrocities.
He was was detained after a video, which included comments about ‘cutting the ears off’ Muslims, was shared on Facebook.
Earlier hearings have heard defence lawyers say that Hepplestall was ‘not a racist’ and ‘not a threat to mosques’.
A man who allegedly went on a racist rant about blowing up mosques is trying to get the case against him thrown out.
Paul Hepplestall was arrested after the video nasty was widely shared online in the wake of recent terror attacks blighting the UK.
The 39-year-old is charged with ‘intending to cause harassment, alarm of distress used threatening abusive or insulting language and was wholly or partly motivated to do so by hostility towards members of a particular racial group.’
A second charge, under the Criminal Damages Act, alleges that Hepplestall, “threatened to destroy or damage property, namely mosques belonging to others”.
But his barrister, Lloyd Morgan, today said he would be putting forward an application to dismiss both charges against Hepplestall.
That 90-minute hearing will take place at the end of September at Liverpool Crown Court.
READ MORE
Man alleged to have made anti Muslim rant video brands charges "a shambles"
A date for a trial was still scheduled for October, and is expected to last up to four days.
Hepplestall appeared via video-link from HMP Liverpool. Wearing a white T-shirt, he spoke only to confirm his name.
It is alleged that Hepplestall, of Cornwallis Street, in Liverpool, was featured on a video which showed a man with a bladed weapon discussing the recent atrocities.
He was was detained after a video, which included comments about ‘cutting the ears off’ Muslims, was shared on Facebook.
Earlier hearings have heard defence lawyers say that Hepplestall was ‘not a racist’ and ‘not a threat to mosques’.
living man 01- news worthy
- Posts : 126
Join date : 2017-05-29
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» What Are Human Rights
» Human Rights
» Human Rights Act - Article 5
» Human Rights Act - Article 3
» Human Rights Act - Article 6
» Human Rights
» Human Rights Act - Article 5
» Human Rights Act - Article 3
» Human Rights Act - Article 6
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum