V.Important

Hi assassin

Not me, bro! i made distinction earlier.
(And i'm expecting a gold star!)

Got something lawful for us?

Cheers!

assassin wrote:And everyone is quoting legal.

What would you quote then ?

They use anything so they can confuse people into believing they are right.

This Bill Turner guy seems legit.
In this informative video, Bill Turner explains how the people controlling the legal system enslave you shortly after your mother gave birth to you. Shortly after you were born, your parents signed a birth certificate with your legal name written on it. When they did this, they registered you to the corporate government, allowing its employees to create a trust under your legal name, turning you into a corporate slave to be used in commerce.

In my book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words, I said that a birth certificate is actually a death certificate. Bill confirms this by saying that the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 1995 defines the word birth using these exact words: “includes a still-birth”. Here is a screenshot of the interpretation section of that registration act:

In the legal system, when the word include is used in an interpretation or definition, it excludes everything else that is not in that interpretation or definition. In other words, the phrase “includes a still-birth” means that it only includes a still-birth and nothing else. The “product” of a still-birth is a still-born child, which is a child incapable of living or dead. Therefore, the hidden meaning of a birth certificate is a certificate of a dead child or a death certificate.

By agreeing to sign a birth certificate/death certificate, your parents have agreed to turn you into a still-born child/dead child. A dead child does not have natural rights and cannot own property. This is why the government can take away your property and punish you for not paying taxes. If you want to innerstand the information in this article at a very deep level, take action now to read my book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words.

In the following video, Bill also explains why the Bible is a book full of laws. Furthermore, he reveals why lawyers wrote the “law” of the legal system in a way that is confusing to people who are not lawyers. One of the reasons that they did this is to discourage you to learn about the law and your rights. When you study the law deeply enough, you will know how to defend your rights, allowing you to free yourself from their legal system.


Will post link when allowed!

Came across this as well:

How You Were Tricked to Live in the Land of the Legally Dead

The current reality of man is heavily controlled by words. As a result of that, words play a big role in shaping the reality and culture of man. Besides shaping the reality and culture of man, words also play an important role in trade. Some of the most important words used in the business of trading goods and services are related to the name. Your name plays a very important role in your life because it allows others to identify you and communicate with you. Furthermore, it allows you to operate in the realm of commerce and fiction, making it easier for you to trade goods and services with people not living close to you.

Having a name can be a wonderful thing but if you do not know how to use it wisely, it can be a curse and prevent you from living a happy life. One of the ways that your name can curse you is when you allow it to bond to your mind too deeply, causing you to think that your name is who you really are. Your name has the power to trick your mind because it is made up of sigils (letters). Because of this, it is important to use your name wisely, so you do not become a victim of your name.

When you do not know how to use your name wisely, the Dark Magicians or the Elite can use it to imprison your body, mind and soul in the “land” of the legally DEAD. The best time to trick you to “live” in the land of the legally dead or the “sea” of the legally dead is on the day your mother gave “birth” to you.
How You Were Tricked to Live in the Land of the Legally Dead

The contract that the government used to trick your mother and father to agree to allow you to live in the “land” or “sea” of the legally dead is the birth certificate. This certificate is actually a certificate of a dead baby, which is why it has a legal name written on it. The name or legal name is not you because your are living and made of flesh and blood. For evidence showing that the birth certificate is a death certificate, read my informative article titled The Law and You: How the Birth Certificate is Used to Take Away Your Natural Rights.

It is interesting to know that when you look up the word birth in A Dictionary of Law (1889), it tells you to “see Abandon, 2 (2)”. The word abandon in section 2 (2) is defined by A Dictionary of Law (1889) using these exact words: “The act of a parent in exposing an infant of tender years (usually under seven) in any place, with intent wholly to desert it.”

Based on the definition in the previous paragraph, when your mother gave birth to you and your parents signed the birth certificate with your name on it, they unknowingly agreed to abandon you. This allowed the State to claim “you” as its property and ship “you” to the land of the legally dead (legal fiction). Be aware that the word birth sounds almost identical to the word berth. Because they sound nearly identical, a judge or government agent can use them to trick you to think that he is talking about birth when he is actually talking about berth and vice versa. The word berth is defined as “sufficient space for a vessel to maneuver; sea room” or “a space for a vessel to dock or anchor”.

Here is an excerpt from my Amazon best seller book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words that reveals how words are used to deceive you:

When a ship is in the process of being docked, it is being guided to come to berth. The word berth is defined as “a space for a vessel to dock or anchor”.33 Based on this information, when a product is unloaded onto the dock, it just went through the berthing process, which is the process of delivering the product from the vessel/ship onto the dock.



Phonetically, the word berth sounds like the word birth. This is why when a woman is in the process of giving birth, she is said to be delivering a baby. The birthing process of a baby is related to the process of delivering a product on a ship. Every woman has a body. Another word for body is vessel. A vessel can also be called a ship. The words body, vessel, and ship can all mean the same thing and be used to represent a woman’s body. This is why a ship is often referred to as “she” and the main ship is often called the “mother ship”.



To connect the dots, the process of a woman giving birth can also be defined as the process of delivering or berthing a product of a ship. Metaphorically speaking, the product is the baby and the ship is the woman’s body. When you compare all the information that you just read about commerce and the sea business to the process of birthing a baby, you will see a strong connection between the berthing process of a ship and the birthing process of a baby.



By spelling the words berth and birth slightly different and making them sound almost the same, the Dark Forces and their minions (the Dark Magicians) can trick you to agree to be a product of a ship, so that they can have jurisdiction over you. They know that they can not have jurisdiction over the real you (the living, breathing man or woman made of flesh and blood), which is why they need you to consent to be an artificial person, so that they can treat you like a product and make money by selling you on the stock market.”

The process of tricking you to agree to be an artificial person is mostly done through the legal system, which is the system that deals with the DEAD. The legal system is controlled by the Vatican of the Holy Roman Empire, one of the biggest practitioners of magic spells. The legal system is obsessed with magic spells, because certain magic spells have the power to summon the dead. This is why before a judge (also known as a magistrate/magi-strate, which is a magician) demands you to appear in court, a court agent needs to serve you a summons letter.
Why a Summons Letter Is Used to Summon the DEAD

When a court agent serves you a summons letter, the first question he asks you is often related to your legal name, which 99 percent of the time is written in all capital letters on legal documents. For example, the court agent may ask you the question “are you JOHN DOE?” If you were to answer yes to being your legal name and accept the summons letter, you would basically agree to play the role of a dead character. This occurs because the legal name is not living; instead it is a fictitious entity that has no life force of its own. As a result of that, it is as dead as a fictional character in a storybook. The summons letter is used to summon the dead using you (the living man or woman) as the medium. This is why a court agent has to serve you a summons letter with your legal name on it before a judge can demand you to appear in court.

To connect the dots, when you accept a summons letter, whether you realize it or not, you agree to raise the dead so you can play the role of a dead character. In other words, you agree to be a zombie. This is why it is called a summons letter. What do witches do when they want to communicate with dead spirits? They summon them using certain magic spells.

Have you seen the TV series The Walking Dead? In this TV series, the zombies represent the sheeple who do not even realize that they are legally dead. In other words, from the perspective of the the Dark Magicians, you are the walking dead, get it? The zombie apocalypse is not something that could happen in the future. It is already here because the people are, in a sense, the walking dead!

To learn how to free yourself from the land or sea of the legally dead, you need to learn how to use words wisely. Furthermore, you need to learn how to use the power of Natural Law to exercise your natural rights. To learn how to do these things, visit my website EsotericKnowledge.me and become a member.

Will post the link when allowed!

the K.J.V buy-bull aspect.

macena wrote:This Bill Turner guy seems legit.
In this informative video, Bill Turner explains how the people controlling the legal system enslave you shortly after your mother gave birth to you. Shortly after you were born, your parents signed a birth certificate with your legal name written on it. When they did this, they registered you to the corporate government, allowing its employees to create a trust under your legal name, turning you into a corporate slave to be used in commerce.

In my book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words, I said that a birth certificate is actually a death certificate. Bill confirms this by saying that the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 1995 defines the word birth using these exact words: “includes a still-birth”. Here is a screenshot of the interpretation section of that registration act:

In the legal system, when the word include is used in an interpretation or definition, it excludes everything else that is not in that interpretation or definition. In other words, the phrase “includes a still-birth” means that it only includes a still-birth and nothing else. The “product” of a still-birth is a still-born child, which is a child incapable of living or dead. Therefore, the hidden meaning of a birth certificate is a certificate of a dead child or a death certificate.

By agreeing to sign a birth certificate/death certificate, your parents have agreed to turn you into a still-born child/dead child. A dead child does not have natural rights and cannot own property. This is why the government can take away your property and punish you for not paying taxes. If you want to innerstand the information in this article at a very deep level, take action now to read my book titled Word Magic: The Powers & Occult Definitions of Words.

In the following video, Bill also explains why the Bible is a book full of laws. Furthermore, he reveals why lawyers wrote the “law” of the legal system in a way that is confusing to people who are not lawyers. One of the reasons that they did this is to discourage you to learn about the law and your rights. When you study the law deeply enough, you will know how to defend your rights, allowing you to free yourself from their legal system.


Will post link when allowed!

Why do they do this?
Why not just go out and create a trust with any ole name?
why do I get turned into a coproate slave.
Who gains from this?
Who puts the money into it?
why do they create a trust or account using our BC and why do they put money into it?
Why am I never told?

I've read many people say there is way of accessing the money in the account but no one seems to know exactly how its done. I read of some ways and listened to videos saying how to do it but they are always American and there does not seem to a great deal of commonality of method amoung them.

Does the same process apply in all countries?

thanks

Hi guys

macena - good stuff! Got to be honest and tell you that the guys here looking into the subject are already aware of the info you've posted, but it's good to see it laid out like that.

You've just provided me with an important missing link, that i was unaware of, that adds credence to a theory in a post i am currently drafting. Thanks!

Ausk - i have answers to your questions, whether they are the right answers i know not.

Stay tuned to the 'Census: are you in their warehouse' thread, it'll be going up hopefully today sometime.

Pitano1 - is that a Christian man called Dan? He's got some good info, he's right into christian remedy - hard core style, but he dodges some questions.

Cheers!

hi lamani.
you are indeed correct.
He has made some...VERY..interesting vids.

I found his vids about words/language very
Enlightening.

after watching this, am totally disgusted - the conning bastrads

Hi pitano1

Yes, he is very well read, i've watched one or two of his vids myself.

If you like his stuff you will want to check out these YT channels - paraclete Edward Jay Robin, and Lotus:Justice....

Be aware though that you'll be labelled by the likes of David Cameron as a 'Christian fundamentalist'!

Cheers!

Hi LionsShare

Aren't they though? Diabolical!

Cheers!

There are no current outstanding changes needed to be made in this section of this act!


Fathers may dispose of the custody of children during their minority. Except Popish Recusants. Actions of Ravishment of Ward for Guardians.

[F1And where any person hath or shall have any Child or Children under the age of [F2eighteen years] and not married at the time of his death that it shall and may be lawfull to and for the Father of such child or children, [X1whether borne at the time of the decease of the Father or at that time in ventre sa mere, or whether such Father be within the age] of [F2eighteen years] or of full age by his deed executed in his life time, or by his last Will and Testament in writeing in the presence of two or more credible witnesses in such manner and from time to time as he shall respectively thinke fitt to dispose of the custody and tuition of such child or children for and dureing such time as he or they shall respectively remaine under the age of twenty one yeares or any lesser time to any person or persons in possession or remainder other than Popish Recusants, And that such disposition of the custodie of such childe or children made since the twenty fourth of February One thousand six hundred forty five or hereafter to be made shall be good and effectuall against all and every person or persons claiming the custody or tuition of such childe or children as Guardian in soccage or otherwise; And that such person or persons to whom the custodie of such childe or children hath beene or shall be soe disposed or devised as aforesaid shall and may maintaine an action of Ravishment of Ward or trespasse against any person or persons which shall wrongfully take away or detaine such childe or children for the Recovery of such childe or children and shall and may recover damages for the same in the said Action for the use and benefit of such childe or children.]




The father should dispose of the custody of guardianship by deed or by will. The father is no longer the natural father under the children's act 1989, this means the father is not considered the inherent heir of the child. Who is the father, I would suggest that the doctrine parens patriae then takes prescedence, the lord chancellor or lord treasurer, if it's lucrative for the crown, acts on behalf of the sovereign, that's why the treasury commissioners tell the GRO where they need to deposit the registers. They know which County is going to be administrating the estate.

The intestate estate devolves to the sovereign as there is no heir. By registering the birth the county then become the father under parentis loci (in place of a parent), which is why/how they enforce the education and medication of children.

The father and mother both register the estate with the county assigning them guardianship of it and consent to being the child's sureties/guardians on their behalf, the county and the sovereign are the true parents/father in their eyes which is how they can kidnap our children, if we take them to Disney land during term time. All because Daddy didn't know he needed to dispose of his property by a deed or a will ventre sa mere.

Hi guys

Waffle - 'by his deed executed in his lifetime' is i feel a term worthy of further investigation....

Does a father get to see the 'record of live birth' as it is filled out? If not, i think i know why.....

Cheers!

Thanks Macena, Yes Bill has done some good research but relies primarily on NZ statutory guidance or misguidance as the case may be.

He has a good idea in my view, but he made a horrendous error or you have with the mistranslation of the word includes.

Includes is expansive, not restrictive.... for example Blue includes yellow and green (but nothing else).

Means is restrictive... for example Water means tap water (only tap water). - this is what you will find if you read a statutory interpretation guide or manual for legal drafters or scriveners.

So you see you make an error like that and go off at 10 degrees and that 10 degrees soon becomes 360 degrees. Which is what a lot of us have spent years doing - going around in circles because of people being lazy or over zealous with the details.

Pitano - thanks interesting video by Dan, I almost concur (a little) Jesus was born outside of the jurisdiction of the Civis/roman Governor as portrayed by the allegorical (possibly real) story of beth lehem (house of the lamb).

The irony is then is that the Hospitalers (knights of St John) are the founding order behind hospitals and the temple church in the city of London - from where the inns of law were formed. (The older QC's know of this; modern lawyers do not really know the provenance of their own orders and society, so you will find it in older books)

Hospitals are ecclesiastical institutions that also have a military and freemasonic provenance - so where do you think their jurisdiction lies ?

Have you ever seen the symbol H anywhere else than a Hospital ?

Hi guys

Candor - perhaps a Heliport?

i have to say i have always accepted 'includes' as excluding that which is not included - it seems to fit in lots of places. The example you give seems to be more trickery by the scriveners, a cleverly conceived exception to the rule that 'includes' is exclusive.

It is my belief that hospitals were created purely to exploit the BC system and milk the perpetual accounts. 'Foundling' hospitals? Doesn't that just tell all? Much easier to have everyone come to one spot to be enslaved rather than having to go out to find them.....

i respect your opinion and suspect you have more info than i do - but if I accept your definition of 'includes' i will have to change several ideas i have and i am loath to do that unless absolutely necessary (for obvious reasons).

So may i be so bold as to ask for proof of your assertion? Again, with respect.

Cheers!

The Heir is the one who inherits ... except he or she doesn't because the Crown abolished the laws of Inheritance in 1925.

The father should dispose of the Estate by will or deed of trust, except his Estate is placed into Probate by default.

If any of you have taken the time to listen to Frank O Collins on his UCADIA audios you would know what an ingenious trick they pulled to make that happen.

Read the Wills Act of 1837, they tell you. albeit by writing the text in the most awkward style possible.

They have effectively shut down the public record and placed everything in the ambit of Corporate Policy - if you do not have a publically recorded Will that is perfected (that is notice of a will - not its contents)- you have no will.

Unless you have publically recorded the Administration and Government of your Estate by way of Notice to the appropriate Registrars in their system (which includes accounting for wards) - they do it for you, of course it is not that simple or easy.

By the way when you do this they know you are trying to scale the prison fence and will do everything to shoot you down, a friend of mine got a BRO for 15 years for presenting his will in the High Court of appeal - a bit harsh for a possible admin error don't you think ? .. go figure.

Hi guys

In removing the fathers' rights doesn'that make us ALL chattel?

Cheers!

hi. candor.
[Pitano - thanks interesting video by Dan]
no worries bro.
Regarding the letter..H.

I`m thinking-water/maritime as in H.2.0
regards.
pitano1.

Hi iamani

We were personal property way before they removed the fathers rights. The mother and children historically were always personal property of the Father. Now they have taken away the natural father rule of law, the father is going to find it very difficult to claim his personal property/chattel

Hi Waffle

i get what you're saying, and i agree. They are slowly removing all possible controversy over who has rights to the young. They're boiling a live frog.

In discussing this topic we are hopping between jurisdictions like a worried judge. Do you think we should define some terms as to their own jurisdiction for clarity?

Cheers!

Hey Iamani

https://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod2/2_2_3_stat_interp/04_other_rules.htm

I had better references but cannot find them at the moment, but that should be clear enough, it is not rocket science is it.


Expressio unius est exclusio alterius  

Maxwell, Interpretation of Statutes:

Mention of one or more things of a particular class may be regarded as silently excluding all other members of the class"

As you can see it is inclusive, until the things classified are exhausted, if you wish to be absolutely exclusive, you use "Means".

You are free to take any other interpretation, but if this is what the courts are using, then I would have thought it wise to concur, moving forward.

* Heliport - what's that a portal into Hell, there is a thought, I see two pillars and a bar.

iamani wrote:Hi guys

In removing the fathers' rights doesn'that make us ALL chattel?

Cheers!

We are certainly being treated that way aren't we, I can think of many examples where they treat us a things or an "It".

Hi Candor

The courts get away with using all sorts of 'interpretations' due to our ignorance.

The emboldened quote seems to confirm the view that 'inclusive' would be exclusive - am i reading it wrong?

Cheers!

Yes because you are restricting it before including the same things in that class - Unius is saying to unify the same things, if they are not of those things they are excluded.

Nothing like the fmotl version floating about which used the expression in the same way "means" should be used.