Re: Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited

by Indebttoo Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:44 pm

Great, I’ll let you now when I get the next letter... Thanks.

by **daveiron** Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:30 am

I don't know ,but I like to think these parasites only get paid by results.

by Indebttoo Thu Oct 18, 2018 2:41 pm

Hello,

It's been a while...
I have received a letter from Hoist Finance UK Holdings 1 Limited (which was incorporated two months ago) saying that ownership of my account was transferred from previous parasites.
In the letter from Hoist Portfolio Holdings Limited (in above thread) they say that my account has been returned to their client. If the account has been returned to a client how it comes that Hoist Finance UK Holdings transferred the account to Hoist Finance UK Holdings 1 Limited, which is only two months old? It seems like fishing...

Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited - Page 2 Hfukh110

by **daveiron** Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:27 pm

Hi ,
I believe that letter has been sent to all of their 'customers' recently ,check other threads on here.
Just ignore it .Let sleeping dogs be.

by Indebttoo Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:17 pm

Ok, tanks daveiron. I’ll check other threads.

by handle Fri Oct 19, 2018 1:40 pm

Tiggy wrote:

... As far as I know MKDP has been dissolved so they're not a renamed Company (under the Companies Act a renamed Company is the same legal entity).

MKDP LLP are not dissolved. They are owned by Hoist, Compello and Mke UK Ltd

by waylander62 Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:20 pm

MKDP no longer in fact exist, hoist portfolio have replaced MKDP as the owner of any debt previously owned by MKDP.

they actually went to the high court ( i think) and obtained permission to replace MKDP on every claim that MKDP had already submitted !!

by handle Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:54 am

No . MKDP do exist and you can see this on companies house. There has been no change in their trading activity.

by waylander62 Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:45 pm

handle wrote:No . MKDP do exist and you can see this on companies house. There has been no change in their trading activity.

not seen MKDP chase anyone for a debt for a long time, hoist replaced MKDP on any claim form that MKDP had issued they got a high court order permitting them to do this

by handle Mon Nov 05, 2018 8:32 am

Very interesting. How do you know about the High Court order. ? Did they need an order when they could have simply assigned their rights

by waylander62 Mon Nov 05, 2018 6:48 pm

handle wrote:Very interesting. How do you know about the High Court order. ? Did they need an order when they could have simply assigned their rights

yes it is very interesting, i have a copy of it Cool

,

they needed an order to replace MKDP as the claimant on already issued claims, assignment would only have given them the right,title and interest to collect on the debt therefore they would have been forced to re issue a claim themselves in their own name, so by getting a court order they saved themselves a fortune in claim costs.

by Indebttoo Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:42 pm

Hello,
I have received a reply to the first letter from credit security limited saying that:
1. The above account is not subject to the Bills of Exchange Act (1882).
2. The account is not subject to a Deed of Assignment as the account has not been sold to this company but was referred to us by our client to monitor and maintain in accordance with their Terms and Conditions.
3. We have not entered into any agreement with yourself for payment of your time and therefore any request for payment is declined.

How should I interpret this response? Thanks.

by **daveiron** Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:06 pm

They are only collectors, if you have sent letter one for debt collectors .
send letter two.

by Indebttoo Tue Feb 25, 2020 7:16 pm

Thank you for the quick response.
I just a few days ago sent them the first letter. So, as I understand I just continue the normal 3 letter process? Thanks.

by Indebttoo Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:35 pm

Hello,

I sent them two letters so far and received a response with a big pile of some sort of statements and some sort of agreement where instead of customer signature x is placed. And now they are asking to arrange the payment. So, they still haven't provided me the required documents.
Should I just send them a third letter when it's due and ignore this?

by Indebttoo Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:36 pm

by Indebttoo Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:49 pm

I am planning to send them the following letter. Any opinion appreciated. Thank you.

Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited - Page 2 Screen14

by **LionsShare** Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:31 pm

from my experience with utilities in getting an answer to your entitlement, good luck!

please PM me & will explain.

by **LionsShare** Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:38 pm

hope my response to your PM is enough. Pleasae send your posted letter.

there is more to this, please ask.

LS

by Indebttoo Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:01 pm

Thank you very much for your response.

by **LionsShare** Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:05 pm

Indebttoo wrote:Thank you very much for your response.

any time

by **daveiron** Fri Mar 06, 2020 8:04 am

You could add; As your letter purports to be signed by a man or woman
called CREDIT SECURITY Ltd ,please confirm that he / she is the one with
first hand knowledge in this matter.

by Indebttoo Fri Mar 06, 2020 8:35 am

Thanks daveiron.

by Indebttoo Thu Mar 12, 2020 3:40 pm

Hello,
I've received a response with the signature and name (below) to my last letter (above). I have also sent letter 3, but they have not received it yet. I am not sure what to do next, how to react to their response?

Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited - Page 2 Respon14

by **daveiron** Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:45 pm

Ignore them now,they will pass it back.

by Sponsored content