24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies

Nice try but it doesn't look like anybody wants to give him any money. The £500,000 target was perhaps asking a little too much.

Meanwhile our friend Olu has utilised his musical friends to make him a few bob, obviously the millions of pounds raised already just isn't enough.

https://siphili.bandcamp.com/track/24-storeys-of-pain

Awoken2 wrote:Meanwhile our friend Olu has utilised his musical friends to make him a few bob, obviously the millions of pounds raised already just isn't enough.

https://siphili.bandcamp.com/track/24-storeys-of-pain

His last Track was CORBYN for the WIN.
No agenda here folks,

look at the song art sleeve, SI Op hili ?

I would have started the song perhaps a little differently replacing the line...

"I was sitting in my chair, filling in a dumb questionnaire" to

"I was in bed with my fam, didn't hear no fire alam"

...just for authenticity like.

Lopsum wrote:look at the song art sleeve, SI Op hili ?

The merchandise also advertises their cause quite clearly

https://siphili.bandcamp.com/merch

This video may help you join the dots.
I've been aware for quite some time of the link between the CIA and the Illuminati.

The two people I have highlighted in this thread (Talabi and Fairbairn) appear to both have Illuminati links.

I've only come across this video today for the first time but I feel it's contents are extremely relevant to current events.

I'd welcome anyone elses opinion on its contents

https://youtu.be/xoM2NiTJq0k

Everything they do is explained right here. Please note the Phoenix connection.

https://youtu.be/fvHD5dFiEPI

A fitting end to this thread, unfortunately they came from Joseph Goebbels...

"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play"

And also....

"Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated 
are confident they are acting on their own free will"

As some of you may be aware I've been on a personal mission to try and expose the MSM over their coverage of the Grenfell Tower fire.

I focussed my attention on the crisis actors that the BBC and tabloid press were utilising to tell their story namely Oluwasean Talabi and Christos Fairbairn.

Both of these men made ridiculous claims about how they escaped the building, one at 3.30 am with a wet towel over his mouth and the other at 4.30am with a wet t-shirt over his mouth. Both of these accounts were utterly ridiculous as the building was a raging inferno, internally and externally by 3.00am.

I was that incensed at what I was listening to I decided to complain to IPSO about the matter, IPSO are the organisation who are supposedly there to ensure that the tabloid press don't tell any lies or print false stories.

Below is a copy of my second e-mail to IPSO after they rejected my original complaint and their response.

What this does prove is that IPSO as an organisation is totally and completely innefective at filtering fake news so in effect the tabloid press can print whatever story they like, true or not without any repercussions whatsoever.

So in summary if the person who has colluded with the news outlet to make a fake news story refuses to speak to IPSO over the matter then the matter doesn't get investigated.

THAT'S how they can get away with it, time and time again.

My second email below....



Dear Sir/Madam


I wish to have the Executives decision to reject my complaint reviewed for the following reasons.


Your response to my first point is based on an assumption that I am a third party who was not personally and directly affected by the alleged breach of the Editor's Code of Practice. 


How did you come to this conclusion without asking me if I had been directly and personally affected? 


In 1973, 44 years ago to this day I was at Summerland in the Isle of Man when a devastating fire broke out which killed many people, I managed to escape with my family that night but since then have a major phobia about fires and people being trapped.


I also have a good friend who teaches in Kensington and one of his pupils has not returned to class and is still unaccounted for. They were also deeply disturbed about the Sun's story and they have also supported my complaint.


The Sun's story about "Pat" who caught a child thrown from a fifth storey window is completely fabricated.


I spoke to Hannah on the Sun's newsdesk about this and she said that the information they were given came from an unidentified and unverified source.


The photographs used in the article were pictures of Oluwasean Talabi. The reason why I know this is because Mr Talabi himself has admitted that the Sun made the story up and used his pictures so how can this not be a direct breach of your code of Practice?


Am I then correct to assume by your response that a newspaper can print any story it wishes without any factual basis as long as the person in the story does not complain themselves? 


Would this scenario not make your complaints process totally innefective if the person in question was in collusion with the newspaper to help create a sensationalist storyline? 


The story which was put out to the public was false and the subtitles under the photographs were also false. If this isn't a clear breach of your Code of Conduct then what is exactly?


The fact that my complaint was not investigated because I didn't "qualify" is not acceptable and the fact that you didn't even question the Sun about this ridiculous and highly offensive article is even more upsetting. 


I would like this matter to be looked at again without prejudice.

And here is their laughable response ...

Dear Mr Owen,

 

The Complaints Committee has considered your complaint, the email of 27 July 2017 from IPSO’s Executive notifying you of its view that your complaint did not raise a possible breach of the Editors’ Code of Practice, and your email of 2 August 2017 requesting a review of the Executive’s decision.

 

The Committee acknowledged that you have been affected by the article. However, under the terms of the Editors’ Code, to take forward a third party complaint under Clause 1 (Accuracy), the Committee must consider the individual about whom the alleged inaccuracy most directly affects. In this instance, the Committee decided that the alleged inaccuracies in your complaint related directly to the man identified in the article, and it would not be possible or appropriate for us to investigate the complaint without his input. As such, the Committee declined to re-open your complaint.

 

We refer to the guidance published on our website in relation to this matter: https://www.ipso.co.uk/make-a-complaint/.

 

The Committee would like to thank you for giving it the opportunity to consider your concerns. 

 

Best wishes,

Lauren Sloan


So now you know, and so do I.

 

Hi Awoken2

i share your disgust. It would appear that IPSO is just another gatekeeper along the lines of the IPCC.

OK, we know how to get round the IPCC - what about IPSO? Is there a common-law application we can use? A commercial avenue? Human rights?There must be another option we are missing.....

i'm still of the opinion that the tower was empty just like the WTC.

Any way we can find out how many deaths were 'registered' in the borough on that day? It should be, say, 500 above the statistical norm should it not? They've had plenty of time to register the event by now....

Cheers!

Awoken2......well done. Nicely worded as well.

There is more to come....................
this "disaster" is about to go national.

Iamani, I can understand why you have that opinion.

Some Related Stuff,

Hi Iamani,

I'm not finished with this yet, I'm sure there is an ombudsman or something I can contact so that's my next step. It does appear that IPSO is only there to protect the tabloid press, contrary to their "code of conduct"

Handle,

I've achieved nothing so far, for now they may have won the battle but they haven't won the war!

If anybdy here has a Patreon account and would like to help me out with something it would be much appreciated.

....I'm not going to ask for money I hasten to add

iamani wrote:Hi Awoken2

i share your disgust. It would appear that IPSO is just another gatekeeper along the lines of the IPCC.

OK, we know how to get round the IPCC  -  what about IPSO? Is there a common-law application we can use? A commercial avenue? Human rights?There must be another option we are missing.....

i'm still of the opinion that the tower was empty just like the WTC.

Any way we can find out how many deaths were 'registered' in the borough on that day? It should be, say, 500 above the statistical norm should it not? They've had plenty of time to register the event by now....

Cheers!

These people also think there were no deaths.

https://nodisinfo.com/grenfell-tower-fake-fire-started-london-firemen-pyrotechnicians/

Hi Awoken2

THE FECKIN' FECKERS!

Great find buddy! Thanks for the link, i've not seen this site before.

......and i'm REALLY disappointed if the fire-bobbies were in on it - is nothing sacred anymore?

Cheers!

nodisinfo lol, dont swallow guys lol

iamani wrote:Hi Awoken2

THE FECKIN' FECKERS!

Great find buddy! Thanks for the link, i've not seen this site before.

......and i'm REALLY disappointed if the fire-bobbies were in on it  -  is nothing sacred anymore?

Cheers!

Come on iamani , the firebrigade union is too strong for them to have been all taken over.
Similar to catalunya, they couldnt have Hoaxed it ,
Ive met ambulance people , and they wouldnt agree to it.

That was the wrong link, mean't to post this one

https://nodisinfo.com/evacuation-pictures-grenfell-tower-fire-prove-hoax/

Hi guys

S.O.T.S. - i really should try harder, but it's difficult to convey 'tongue-in-cheek' sometimes (and i REFUSE to use emoji's!). My uncle was a fireman, i don't think they'd take part (unless perhaps duped initially and then.... well, every man has his price...) but that doesn't rule out possibility of fakes. They're ALL hoaxes - i got tired of getting duped after the Nice lorry episode. Grenfell, due to its scope fooled me at first - but no-one died, and nobody got hurt imo.

Lopsum - do you find their claims so outlandish in this instance?

Awoken2 - it's the only thing that makes any sort of sense. i wonder how long it'll be before former residents are reported as having been found rich in their native land. Or how long before one of those crisis actors is finally overcome by his own narcissism enough to blab?

Just a whimsical for fellow thinkers: how funny would it be if the crisis actors had all been offered/given £millions just prior to a world financial market crash caused by mass TDA access followed by inflation so bad as to reduce all the new millionaires back to paupers?

Cheers!

Iamani, even if one of them did decide to blow the whistle what platform could they use? I would imagine the consequences of doing so would be a good enough motivator to say nothing.

There was no evidence whatsoever of either of the BBC'S "victims" (Talabi and Fairbairn) ever living in Grenfell Tower but they were both registered at other addresses in London.

As soon as Talabi was outed as a fraud he stepped out of the camera straight away and was replaced with Mr Fairbairn with an even more ridiculous story, never mind his sinister FB profile.

Their only job was to con the public and sadly, they succeeded.

Hi Awoken2

Yes it is sad that they succeeded - but that's not necessarily a reason to be discouraged. There's a lot more awake and 'realised' people now than at 9/11, the truth WILL out....

We just have to keep tuggin' those loose threads.

Cheers!

there would be alot more woken if it wasnt for the BS so often tagged in with the truth.
the people that need to wake up are the ones still believing the BBC and government etc
ps i cannot personally verify or debunk any of the info in that particular article but it offers no proof it was a "hoax" it does show evidence of crisis actors being used .
The other article about pyrotechnics also offers no proof that it is the case ,mere speculation based on stabilized footage of the fire burning what we know is the cladding/insulation layer .Yet reported as fact !
The whole site seems dubious despite its zionist related articles , tending toward paranoia and "hoaxing" without sufficient proof , with a mix of pro muslim anti zionist/jewish stuff ,debunked theorys on 911,Fukushima fear porn, and all staged falseflags are "hoaxes" no one died no one was injured .
This says enough to me to be wary .