Search
Latest topics
» Leighton vs Bristow & Sutor high court ruling. 'enforcement agent' needed to supply a legally executed liability order to prove any authority.by wakey wakey Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:01 pm
» Brandon Joe Williams
by grams Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:29 am
» A Parcel sent to me worth 99p ! Court Claim received !
by memegirl777 Sun Nov 03, 2024 4:53 pm
» UK Courts Using Faulty Cell Site Data a Serious Concern!!
by midnight Sun Nov 03, 2024 1:32 pm
» Clowells continue
by Biggiebest Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:47 am
» Legal responsibility
by Biggiebest Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:36 pm
» Composting Leaves
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:25 am
» Composting
by assassin Thu Oct 31, 2024 4:22 am
» BEWARE OF TSB BANK
by daveiron Sun Oct 27, 2024 4:04 am
» Council Tax
by Lopsum Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:57 pm
» Salary Finance
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:56 am
» DWP
by daveiron Thu Oct 24, 2024 10:49 am
» Real Electric Cars
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:53 am
» BOMBSHELL: Slovakia could BAN mRNA vaccines
by assassin Sun Oct 20, 2024 2:40 am
» Council Tax (getting answers)
by assassin Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:22 pm
» DSAR DELAYS
by daveiron Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:20 pm
» For those considering ,conditional acceptance
by daveiron Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:55 am
» Just got a letter
by daveiron Thu Oct 03, 2024 11:46 pm
» Ceder so called bailiffs
by Ian4644 Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:43 pm
» Our Little Food Growing Experiment
by assassin Fri Sep 27, 2024 5:01 am
» Jocabs Threatening my parents address over council tax.
by darkfireblade Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:42 pm
» Heat Your Home
by assassin Mon Sep 23, 2024 3:48 am
» Purchased Used car, thew con rod after 4 weeks, 40,000mi on clock, can we get out of the finance?
by scrwm Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:56 pm
» ULEZ London huge fine for misunderstanding
by urchinatheart Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 pm
» The new ruling, lie-ability order
by assassin Sat Sep 07, 2024 4:19 am
» Prepping 1 Lighting Overview
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:34 am
» Prepping 2 Selecting Light Sources
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:26 am
» Prepping 3 Security
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:21 am
» Prepping 4 Planning Your Lighting
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:18 am
» Prepping 5 Charging Your Batteries
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:15 am
» An idea to reform the police ?
by assassin Fri Sep 06, 2024 4:02 am
» Post 2007 CCA
by Biggiebest Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:47 pm
» Travel advice please: London to Amsterdam no injects no tests
by Kaddabriol Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:39 am
» CCJ letter
by waylander62 Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:12 pm
» Disability
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 3:03 am
» It works (Richard Vobes)
by assassin Sun Sep 01, 2024 2:57 am
» Veronica Chapmans approach to CT
by daveiron Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:17 pm
» Tsb many times refused basic account
by flyingfish Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:53 am
» Lowell New Address
by waylander62 Tue Aug 27, 2024 7:41 pm
» The Daily Mail doesn't know the law on facemasks and disability -ThatguyScottWeb
by Emma78 Mon Aug 26, 2024 9:29 am
» DSAR from OC
by waylander62 Mon Aug 19, 2024 8:46 pm
» HSBC advice please.
by Trishiapp28 Thu Aug 15, 2024 6:30 pm
» Council Tax Notice of Enforcement
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:26 pm
» If The State is Pushing You to Riot , Do the Reverse
by Lopsum Sun Aug 11, 2024 5:16 pm
» Grid Down Mistakes To Avoid
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:05 am
» Grid Down Realities
by assassin Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:57 am
» Lowest of Lowest continue with their fraud
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:09 am
» Government Prepping Food and Water
by assassin Mon Aug 05, 2024 3:07 am
» Subject access dca refused
by daveiron Sat Jul 27, 2024 12:14 am
» Pre action protocol
by Biggiebest Fri Jul 26, 2024 3:40 am
» DCA working on behalf of an energy company
by daveiron Mon Jul 22, 2024 11:45 pm
» More of the Same
by daveiron Sun Jul 21, 2024 12:19 am
» Off Grid Engine Projects
by assassin Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:03 am
» Government Prepping Setting Up
by urchinatheart Wed Jul 17, 2024 8:13 am
» Latest from CrimeBodge
by assassin Tue Jul 16, 2024 4:15 am
Moon phases
Notice of Conditional acceptance for debt purchasers only
Page 1 of 1
Notice of Conditional acceptance for debt purchasers only
Their Address Your Address
xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx zzzzzzzzzzz
To;CEO
cc to whoever has contacted you.
Date xx xx xxxx
Dear xxxxxx
I am somewhat concerned by your assertions that I owe a debt to your
corporation . A debt I have no recollection of.
You claim you have purchased the alleged debt from xxx bank, presumably with all rights.
First and foremost, is this claim legally enforceable? You must clearly answer "yes" or "no"?
1) If "yes" you are obligated by law to provide those financial instruments that are lawfully required for you to evidence your claim to an alleged debt.
2) If "no" you have no further lawful right whatsoever in pursuing this claim and I respectfully ask you to end your harassment (your letters are harassment when a claim is not legally enforceable
I wish to inform you that xxxx bank were and are unable to provide proof
of claim of any such debt by their inability to provide the only document which could
prove their claim, namely the Original Agreement. I am concerned that you have not
purchased any alleged agreement between xxxx bank and myself ,but only a list of
alleged defaulted accounts.
For the avoidance of any doubt I hereby reject and rebut any presumption that I am;
(a) Your customer
(b) Have an account with you.
(c) Have made a complaint.
Please note you only have my consent to contact me via Royal Mail only.
Please take notice of the notice below.
Notice of Conditional Acceptance
I will settle any lawful obligation you believe I have to your corporation upon proof
of a valid claim to my complete satisfaction. Please be aware this notice does not
create a controversy and as such there is nothing for a court to make a judgement
upon.
(1) Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself?
Please answer under your full personal liability.
(2) If you hold the original agreement ,please forward to me a 'True or Certified copy'
along with a 'True or certified copy' of any terms and conditions showing full
disclosure and the name of whoever attests to there authenticity.
(3) Please confirm that the alleged original agreement (herein called 'the note') in
line with standard banking practices and The Bills of Exchange Act 1882.is a
Negotiable Instrument / A Promissory note / Security / Bill of Exchange.
Please answer under full personal liability.
(4) If you have confirmed that paragraph 3 is correct ,are you aware that if such
'note' was deposited by myself with xxxx bank, then I became a creditor of xxxx
bank as per the judgement made by Master of the Rolls Lord Denning who stated
in a precedent High Court judgement: "We have repeatedly said in this court that
a Bill of Exchange or Promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured
unless there is some good reason to the contrary" Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding &
Platt Ltd. v Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969]2 ALL E.R.150 at 152,CA
Please answer under full personal liability.
(5) Please confirm that you are aware that if the alleged 'note' was deposited with
xxxx bank ,that as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014 Q1) it "created
money out of thin air" thereby creating a deposit in the banks ledger to the face
value of the alleged loan, and as such xxxx bank only created the facility to draw
down on said deposit.
Please answer under full personal liability.
(6) As it is recognised that xxxx bank created the money from thin air, you may wish
to obtain clarification from xxxx bank how they suffered a material loss.
(7) Are you aware that if you have not been provided with the alleged original 'note'
by xxxx bank it is possible they may have sold or traded it, and as such if it
exists it may indeed be located anywhere in the world and any holder in due
course would be able to make a claim against me?
Please confirm under full personal liability.
(8) Please confirm that if you are in possession of the alleged original 'note' you will
in exchange for full settlement of the alleged debt ,return it to me in order that I
may personally cancel said note.
(9) Please also supply a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment. As per Van Lynn
Developments Ltd. v Pelias Construction Ltd.1968[3] All 824. Where Lord Denning
M.R. stated "The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to ensure that the
assignee can give good discharge under the contract".
I am prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those
referring to any third parties. See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009) ." where the
debtor is entitled to see a redacted version".
(10) Please supply the name of whoever within your corporation has performed due
diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under full personal liability.
Yours sincerely
By:
john.henry :doe
Authorised agent and representative of JOHN HENRY DOE
Non negotiable- All rights reserved. Errors and omissions excepted.
All contacts recorded.
xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx zzzzzzzzzzz
To;CEO
cc to whoever has contacted you.
Date xx xx xxxx
Dear xxxxxx
I am somewhat concerned by your assertions that I owe a debt to your
corporation . A debt I have no recollection of.
You claim you have purchased the alleged debt from xxx bank, presumably with all rights.
First and foremost, is this claim legally enforceable? You must clearly answer "yes" or "no"?
1) If "yes" you are obligated by law to provide those financial instruments that are lawfully required for you to evidence your claim to an alleged debt.
2) If "no" you have no further lawful right whatsoever in pursuing this claim and I respectfully ask you to end your harassment (your letters are harassment when a claim is not legally enforceable
I wish to inform you that xxxx bank were and are unable to provide proof
of claim of any such debt by their inability to provide the only document which could
prove their claim, namely the Original Agreement. I am concerned that you have not
purchased any alleged agreement between xxxx bank and myself ,but only a list of
alleged defaulted accounts.
For the avoidance of any doubt I hereby reject and rebut any presumption that I am;
(a) Your customer
(b) Have an account with you.
(c) Have made a complaint.
Please note you only have my consent to contact me via Royal Mail only.
Please take notice of the notice below.
Notice of Conditional Acceptance
I will settle any lawful obligation you believe I have to your corporation upon proof
of a valid claim to my complete satisfaction. Please be aware this notice does not
create a controversy and as such there is nothing for a court to make a judgement
upon.
(1) Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself?
Please answer under your full personal liability.
(2) If you hold the original agreement ,please forward to me a 'True or Certified copy'
along with a 'True or certified copy' of any terms and conditions showing full
disclosure and the name of whoever attests to there authenticity.
(3) Please confirm that the alleged original agreement (herein called 'the note') in
line with standard banking practices and The Bills of Exchange Act 1882.is a
Negotiable Instrument / A Promissory note / Security / Bill of Exchange.
Please answer under full personal liability.
(4) If you have confirmed that paragraph 3 is correct ,are you aware that if such
'note' was deposited by myself with xxxx bank, then I became a creditor of xxxx
bank as per the judgement made by Master of the Rolls Lord Denning who stated
in a precedent High Court judgement: "We have repeatedly said in this court that
a Bill of Exchange or Promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured
unless there is some good reason to the contrary" Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding &
Platt Ltd. v Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969]2 ALL E.R.150 at 152,CA
Please answer under full personal liability.
(5) Please confirm that you are aware that if the alleged 'note' was deposited with
xxxx bank ,that as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014 Q1) it "created
money out of thin air" thereby creating a deposit in the banks ledger to the face
value of the alleged loan, and as such xxxx bank only created the facility to draw
down on said deposit.
Please answer under full personal liability.
(6) As it is recognised that xxxx bank created the money from thin air, you may wish
to obtain clarification from xxxx bank how they suffered a material loss.
(7) Are you aware that if you have not been provided with the alleged original 'note'
by xxxx bank it is possible they may have sold or traded it, and as such if it
exists it may indeed be located anywhere in the world and any holder in due
course would be able to make a claim against me?
Please confirm under full personal liability.
(8) Please confirm that if you are in possession of the alleged original 'note' you will
in exchange for full settlement of the alleged debt ,return it to me in order that I
may personally cancel said note.
(9) Please also supply a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment. As per Van Lynn
Developments Ltd. v Pelias Construction Ltd.1968[3] All 824. Where Lord Denning
M.R. stated "The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to ensure that the
assignee can give good discharge under the contract".
I am prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those
referring to any third parties. See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009) ." where the
debtor is entitled to see a redacted version".
(10) Please supply the name of whoever within your corporation has performed due
diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under full personal liability.
Yours sincerely
By:
john.henry :doe
Authorised agent and representative of JOHN HENRY DOE
Non negotiable- All rights reserved. Errors and omissions excepted.
All contacts recorded.
Last edited by daveiron on Thu Sep 16, 2021 8:59 pm; edited 2 times in total
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4984
Join date : 2017-01-17
LionsShare, Mrblue2015 and Pete012 like this post
Re: Notice of Conditional acceptance for debt purchasers only
A few notes to remember; Never refer to these as letters (they are not) they are
Notices.Always send to the CEO use Companies House or Company Check to find the name,or just do a search on line.
These Notices are a continuing work in progress and may be updated at any time.
Always keep and hold on record all,copies or what you send along with tracking
docs.
All correspondance by Royal Mail only.Never ever by phone or Email.
Debts are always 'Alleged'
Always sign on the right hand side (the side of the creditor)
Never start dear (whoever)
As they will not have complied with Notice One ,Send Notice no 2.
At this point the response you will get is they will refer to youir Notice as a complaint
This tactic is used by them in order that at some time they can use the courts.Courts
can only settle disputes ,therefore do not play their game and send them this.
" I have received from you a letter dated xxxx in which you refer to my previous
Notice as a complaint and you suggest the alleged account is in dispute. Please
read carefully below;
I have not now or have at anytime made a complaint.
I do not have now or at anytime have had an account with you.
I am not now or at anytime been a customer of yours. The definition of a
customer is; 'Someone who has received goods or a service'
I trust this now makes my position very clear that there is no dispute and i hereby
rebut your presumption that there is a dispute.
I refer you to my Notice of Conditional Acceptance.
Notice 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Their name and address your name & address
NOTICE-OF-NON-RESPONSE-AND-OPPORTUNITY-TO CURE.
Notice to principle is notice to agent,notice to agent is notice to principle.
To (name of CEO) Acting in your personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer.
Date xxxxx
Their ref no.xxxxxx
I sent a Notice of Conditional Acceptance to you on (insert date) via Royal Mail
tracking no xxxxxx and received by you (insert date).
As of the date of this Notice you have placed yourself in dishonour by your non
response. However if it transpires you have lost or misplaced the Notice.I hereby
attach a copy for your records and attention. (enclose copy of 1st Notice)
For clarification, i require all points to be answered in substance and under full
personal liability.
I await your response in order that this matter can be addressed honourably.
I hereby give you ten (10) days in which to respond.
Yours sincerely
By:
john.henry :Doe
Authorised agent and representative for JOHN HENRY DOE
Non negotiable.All rights reserved.errors and omissions excepted
Implied admission by lack of response and compliance.All contacts recorded.
Notices.Always send to the CEO use Companies House or Company Check to find the name,or just do a search on line.
These Notices are a continuing work in progress and may be updated at any time.
Always keep and hold on record all,copies or what you send along with tracking
docs.
All correspondance by Royal Mail only.Never ever by phone or Email.
Debts are always 'Alleged'
Always sign on the right hand side (the side of the creditor)
Never start dear (whoever)
As they will not have complied with Notice One ,Send Notice no 2.
At this point the response you will get is they will refer to youir Notice as a complaint
This tactic is used by them in order that at some time they can use the courts.Courts
can only settle disputes ,therefore do not play their game and send them this.
" I have received from you a letter dated xxxx in which you refer to my previous
Notice as a complaint and you suggest the alleged account is in dispute. Please
read carefully below;
I have not now or have at anytime made a complaint.
I do not have now or at anytime have had an account with you.
I am not now or at anytime been a customer of yours. The definition of a
customer is; 'Someone who has received goods or a service'
I trust this now makes my position very clear that there is no dispute and i hereby
rebut your presumption that there is a dispute.
I refer you to my Notice of Conditional Acceptance.
Notice 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Their name and address your name & address
NOTICE-OF-NON-RESPONSE-AND-OPPORTUNITY-TO CURE.
Notice to principle is notice to agent,notice to agent is notice to principle.
To (name of CEO) Acting in your personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer.
Date xxxxx
Their ref no.xxxxxx
I sent a Notice of Conditional Acceptance to you on (insert date) via Royal Mail
tracking no xxxxxx and received by you (insert date).
As of the date of this Notice you have placed yourself in dishonour by your non
response. However if it transpires you have lost or misplaced the Notice.I hereby
attach a copy for your records and attention. (enclose copy of 1st Notice)
For clarification, i require all points to be answered in substance and under full
personal liability.
I await your response in order that this matter can be addressed honourably.
I hereby give you ten (10) days in which to respond.
Yours sincerely
By:
john.henry :Doe
Authorised agent and representative for JOHN HENRY DOE
Non negotiable.All rights reserved.errors and omissions excepted
Implied admission by lack of response and compliance.All contacts recorded.
Last edited by daveiron on Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:51 am; edited 5 times in total (Reason for editing : CHANGE OF TITLE)
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4984
Join date : 2017-01-17
LionsShare, Mrblue2015 and Sharpysparky like this post
Third notice
Their Address Your Address
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Private and Confidential
To (name of CEO ) acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer
Date xxxxxx
Sent via Royal Mail with tracking no xxxxxxxxxx
Their ref no xxxxxxxxx
THIRD-NOTICE-OF-CONDITIONAL-ACCEPTANCE
I have previously sent to you via Royal Mail 'signed for' service two (2) Notices of Conditional Acceptance ,bearing tracking no's xxxxxxx & xxxxxxx respectively. Royal Mail records show that these were delivered and signed for on (give dates) .
These were private and confidential correspondence ,to which, as of the date of this Notice no response has been received. Please be aware this continues to place you in dishonour in this matter .As I am sure you would wish to correct your dishonour ,I now via this third and final Notice of Conditional Acceptance request and require your compliance by way of providing answers to the points listed below.
(Repeat the points as in Notice 1)
As it is very clear that I have at no time refused to settle any lawful obligation you believe I have to your corporation ,there can be no Justiciable controversy for any Court to make judgement upon.
(Finish the Notice as previously)
xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Private and Confidential
To (name of CEO ) acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer
Date xxxxxx
Sent via Royal Mail with tracking no xxxxxxxxxx
Their ref no xxxxxxxxx
THIRD-NOTICE-OF-CONDITIONAL-ACCEPTANCE
I have previously sent to you via Royal Mail 'signed for' service two (2) Notices of Conditional Acceptance ,bearing tracking no's xxxxxxx & xxxxxxx respectively. Royal Mail records show that these were delivered and signed for on (give dates) .
These were private and confidential correspondence ,to which, as of the date of this Notice no response has been received. Please be aware this continues to place you in dishonour in this matter .As I am sure you would wish to correct your dishonour ,I now via this third and final Notice of Conditional Acceptance request and require your compliance by way of providing answers to the points listed below.
(Repeat the points as in Notice 1)
As it is very clear that I have at no time refused to settle any lawful obligation you believe I have to your corporation ,there can be no Justiciable controversy for any Court to make judgement upon.
(Finish the Notice as previously)
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4984
Join date : 2017-01-17
LionsShare, living man 01, Mrblue2015, Winston, Trishiapp28, Broke and Biggiebest like this post
4th and final notice
In legal land 3 is the magic number ,you have now sent 3 notices and
its unlikely you have received a response from whoever you addressed
the notices to. Remember these were private and confidential, dont
let them distract you with their BS from a minion.
Under the principles of equity ,if they have not answered ,you can
answer for them .Remember the Maxim " he who does not deny,admits"
You will now have them in a tacit agreement by aquiescence.
You have a choice ,either send this notice or the affidavit below it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Their address your address
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
To (name of CEO) Acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer.
Date xxxxxxxx
Their ref no xxxxxxxx
Sent via Royal Mail with tracking no; xxxxxxxx
NOTICE-OF-NON-RESPONSE-AND-NOTICE-OF-COMMERCIAL-DEFAULT.
(his name) You have previously claimed that I owe a debt to your corporation .As a result of this assumption I have on three (3) occasions sent to you Notices of Conditional
Acceptance in order to settle any lawful obligation you believe I have.
These were sent via Royal Mail 'signed for' bearing tracking no's (add tracking no's)
and according to Royal Mail records were received at your place of business on
( add delivery dates)
As of the date of this final Notice ,no response has been received from you.You are therefore not only in dishonour but also in commercial default regarding this matter.
Take Notice ; Under the principles of Equity I now answer for you and have your tacit agreement by way of quiescence to the following;
1. You were asked ,Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself. You failed to answer ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not hold the original agreement (the note) .
2. You were asked, If you hold the original agreement ,please forward to me a 'true or certified' copy along with a 'true or certified copy' of any terms and conditions showing full disclosure and the name of whoever attests to their authenticity. You have failed to provide such documentation,therefore we have a tacit agreement that you are not in possession of such.
3. You were asked to confirm if the alleged agreement was ,as per the Bills of
Exchange Act 1882 – a Negotiable Instrument,/Promissory Note / Security / Bill
of Exchange. You failed to answer ,therefore you tacitly agree that the agreement
is one or more of the above.
4. You were asked to confirm that if the 'note' was deposited with (xxxx) Bank ,I
then became a creditor of (xxxx)Bank and as per the judgement made by
Master of the Rolls Lord Denning,who stated in a precedent High Court
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
Judgement “ We have repeatedly said in this Court that a Bill of Exchange or
Promissory Note is to be treated as cash,it is to be honoured unless there is some
good reason to the contrary” Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding & Platt Ltd v
Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969] 2 ALL E.R. 150 at 152,CA
You have failed to respond,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that if
any such 'note' was deposited with (xxxx)bank ,I became a creditor of said bank.
To the face value of alleged 'note'.
5. You were asked to confirm that you were aware that if the alleged 'note' was
deposited with (xxxx) bank ,as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014
Q1) .(xxxx)Bank “created money out of thin air” thereby creating a deposit in
banks ledger to the face value of the alleged 'note',and as such (xxxx) bank only
created the facility to draw down on said deposit.
You failed to respond, therefore we now have a tacit agreement that the above
statement is correct.
6. You were asked for clarification from (xxxx) bank ,to provide evidence that they
incurred a material loss.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that no material
loss was incurred by (xxxx) bank.
7. You were asked if you were aware that if you have not been provided with the
original 'note' from (xxx) bank ,it is possible that if the alleged 'note' exists it is
possible they may have sold or traded it,and as such if it exists it may indeed be
located anywhere in the world and any 'Holder in due course' would be able to
make a claim against me.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not
have the 'note' and therefore have no lawful claim .
8. You were asked to confirm that if you had possession of the 'note' you would in
exchange for full settlement of alleged debt ,return said 'note' that I may cancel it.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not
now or have ever had possession of said 'note'.
9. You were asked to provide a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment, as per
Van Lynn developments Ltd v Pelias Construction Ltd .1968 [3] All 824. Where
Lord Denning M.R. stated “The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to
ensure that the assignee can give good discharge under the contract”, I am
however prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those
referring to any third parties,See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009) “Where the
debtor is entitled to see a redacted version.
You failed to respond,we therefore have a tacit agreement that you cannot or will
not provide a certified copy of any alleged Deed of Assignment.
10. You were asked to supply the name of whoever within your corporation has
performed due diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under
their full personal liability.
Page 3 of 3
You failed to respond , therefore we now have a tacit agreement that no one in
your corporation has performed due diligence and or is willing to attest to your
claim under their full personal liability.
It is now by your quiescence ,you have no valid claim against me, as such you will not continue to pursue this matter, any report to a credit reference agency will be removed
immediately and you agree that there exists no Justiciable Controversy.
Should you wish to bring this matter before the Court ,any claim will be vigorously rebutted by way of an affidavit ,which as I am sure you are aware you can only rebut in
substance with factual evidence from a man/woman who takes personal liability.
This Notice will be added to the Record of Private Correspondence
Yours sincerely
By : (sign here)
All rights reserved
john : Doe
Agent and representative for JOHN DOE
Non-Negotiable, Without ill will, Implied admission by lack of response and compliance.
its unlikely you have received a response from whoever you addressed
the notices to. Remember these were private and confidential, dont
let them distract you with their BS from a minion.
Under the principles of equity ,if they have not answered ,you can
answer for them .Remember the Maxim " he who does not deny,admits"
You will now have them in a tacit agreement by aquiescence.
You have a choice ,either send this notice or the affidavit below it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Their address your address
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
To (name of CEO) Acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer.
Date xxxxxxxx
Their ref no xxxxxxxx
Sent via Royal Mail with tracking no; xxxxxxxx
NOTICE-OF-NON-RESPONSE-AND-NOTICE-OF-COMMERCIAL-DEFAULT.
(his name) You have previously claimed that I owe a debt to your corporation .As a result of this assumption I have on three (3) occasions sent to you Notices of Conditional
Acceptance in order to settle any lawful obligation you believe I have.
These were sent via Royal Mail 'signed for' bearing tracking no's (add tracking no's)
and according to Royal Mail records were received at your place of business on
( add delivery dates)
As of the date of this final Notice ,no response has been received from you.You are therefore not only in dishonour but also in commercial default regarding this matter.
Take Notice ; Under the principles of Equity I now answer for you and have your tacit agreement by way of quiescence to the following;
1. You were asked ,Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself. You failed to answer ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not hold the original agreement (the note) .
2. You were asked, If you hold the original agreement ,please forward to me a 'true or certified' copy along with a 'true or certified copy' of any terms and conditions showing full disclosure and the name of whoever attests to their authenticity. You have failed to provide such documentation,therefore we have a tacit agreement that you are not in possession of such.
3. You were asked to confirm if the alleged agreement was ,as per the Bills of
Exchange Act 1882 – a Negotiable Instrument,/Promissory Note / Security / Bill
of Exchange. You failed to answer ,therefore you tacitly agree that the agreement
is one or more of the above.
4. You were asked to confirm that if the 'note' was deposited with (xxxx) Bank ,I
then became a creditor of (xxxx)Bank and as per the judgement made by
Master of the Rolls Lord Denning,who stated in a precedent High Court
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
Judgement “ We have repeatedly said in this Court that a Bill of Exchange or
Promissory Note is to be treated as cash,it is to be honoured unless there is some
good reason to the contrary” Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding & Platt Ltd v
Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969] 2 ALL E.R. 150 at 152,CA
You have failed to respond,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that if
any such 'note' was deposited with (xxxx)bank ,I became a creditor of said bank.
To the face value of alleged 'note'.
5. You were asked to confirm that you were aware that if the alleged 'note' was
deposited with (xxxx) bank ,as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014
Q1) .(xxxx)Bank “created money out of thin air” thereby creating a deposit in
banks ledger to the face value of the alleged 'note',and as such (xxxx) bank only
created the facility to draw down on said deposit.
You failed to respond, therefore we now have a tacit agreement that the above
statement is correct.
6. You were asked for clarification from (xxxx) bank ,to provide evidence that they
incurred a material loss.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that no material
loss was incurred by (xxxx) bank.
7. You were asked if you were aware that if you have not been provided with the
original 'note' from (xxx) bank ,it is possible that if the alleged 'note' exists it is
possible they may have sold or traded it,and as such if it exists it may indeed be
located anywhere in the world and any 'Holder in due course' would be able to
make a claim against me.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not
have the 'note' and therefore have no lawful claim .
8. You were asked to confirm that if you had possession of the 'note' you would in
exchange for full settlement of alleged debt ,return said 'note' that I may cancel it.
You failed to respond ,therefore we now have a tacit agreement that you do not
now or have ever had possession of said 'note'.
9. You were asked to provide a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment, as per
Van Lynn developments Ltd v Pelias Construction Ltd .1968 [3] All 824. Where
Lord Denning M.R. stated “The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to
ensure that the assignee can give good discharge under the contract”, I am
however prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those
referring to any third parties,See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009) “Where the
debtor is entitled to see a redacted version.
You failed to respond,we therefore have a tacit agreement that you cannot or will
not provide a certified copy of any alleged Deed of Assignment.
10. You were asked to supply the name of whoever within your corporation has
performed due diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under
their full personal liability.
Page 3 of 3
You failed to respond , therefore we now have a tacit agreement that no one in
your corporation has performed due diligence and or is willing to attest to your
claim under their full personal liability.
It is now by your quiescence ,you have no valid claim against me, as such you will not continue to pursue this matter, any report to a credit reference agency will be removed
immediately and you agree that there exists no Justiciable Controversy.
Should you wish to bring this matter before the Court ,any claim will be vigorously rebutted by way of an affidavit ,which as I am sure you are aware you can only rebut in
substance with factual evidence from a man/woman who takes personal liability.
This Notice will be added to the Record of Private Correspondence
Yours sincerely
By : (sign here)
All rights reserved
john : Doe
Agent and representative for JOHN DOE
Non-Negotiable, Without ill will, Implied admission by lack of response and compliance.
Last edited by daveiron on Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:07 am; edited 3 times in total
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4984
Join date : 2017-01-17
Mrblue2015 likes this post
Affidavit as an alternative to notice 4
Their Address Your Address
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
.To (name of ceo) Acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer
Date xxx
Their ref; xxxx
NOTICE-OF-CONDITIONAL-ACCEPTANCE-IN-THE-FORM-OF-AN-AFFIDAVIT.
Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum : Let Justice Be Done,Though The Heavens Should Fall
(name of ceo). As you have made a claim against me. This is my final Notice of Conditional Acceptance. Please read the following Notice carefully.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce ;Legal Maxim :He who does not deny,admits.
You have on (add the 2 previous dates) been in receipt of my Notices sent via Royal Mail ,tracking nos (add tracking nos)and received by you on (add dates),you were required to gives specific answers to ten (10) questions in order to substantiate your claim against me that I may settle any lawful claim you believe you have against me upon valid proof of claim.You have failed to respond . I have again listed those requests below.
1. Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself ?
You have failed to respond or rebut, We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have in your possession the alleged agreement .
.
----------------------------
2. If you hold the original agreement,please forward to me a 'True or certified copy' along with a 'True or certified copy 'of any terms and conditions showing full disclosure and the name of whoever attests to their authenticity.
You have failed to respond or rebut,We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have any original agreement or any Terms and conditions relating to this alleged agreement.
--------------------------------
3. Please confirm that the alleged original agreement (herein call the note) in line with standard banking practices and The Bills of Exchange Act 1882. Is a Negotiable Instrument / Promissory Note / Security /Bill of Exchange.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you cannot confirm the status of the alleged note.
----------------------------------
Page 1 of 3
4. If you have confirmed that paragraph 3 is correct,are you aware that if such 'note' was deposited by myself with xxxx Bank ,then I became a creditor of xxxxBank as per the judgement made by Master of the Rolls Lord Denning who stated in a precedent High Court judgment “We have repeatedly said in this Court that a Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary” Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding & Platt Ltd. V Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969]2 ALL E.R. 150 at 152,CA.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that if any such alleged note was deposited by myself with xxxx Bank ,I became a creditor of xxxx Bank to the face value of any alleged note.
-------------------------------
5. Please confirm that you are aware that if the alleged note was deposited with xxxx Bank,that as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014 Q1) xxxx Bank “created money out of thin air” thereby creating a deposit in the banks ledger to the face value of the alleged note,and as such xxxx Bank only created the facility to draw down on said deposit.
You have failed to respond or rebut, We now have a tacit agreement that you are aware that if xxxx Bank performed on an alleged agreement it did nothing more than create and put digits on to a ledger.
-------------------------------------
6. As it is recognised that xxxx Bank created money from thin air,you may wish to obtain clarification from xxxx Bank how they suffered a material loss.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you are aware that xxxx Bank created money from thin air and suffered no material loss.
----------------------------
7. Are you aware that if you have not been provided with the alleged original 'note' from xxxx Bank.It is possible they may have sold or traded it , and as such if it exists it may indeed be located anywhere in the world and any holder in due course would be able to make a claim against me ?
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that unless you hold the aledged 'note' you are unlikely to be the owner of such .This would amount to you making a fraudulent claim against me.
-----------------------------------
8. Please confirm that if you are in possession of the alleged 'note' you will in exchange for full settlement of the alleged debt,return it to me in order that I may personally cancel said 'note'.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have in your possession the alleged 'note' and as such would not be able engage in any transaction pertaining to it.
Page 2 of 3
----------------------------------
9. Please also supply a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment. As per Van Lynn Developments Ltd. V Pelias Construction Ltd.1968[3]All 824. where Lord Denning M.R. stated “ The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to ensure that the assignee can give good discharge under the contract”. I am prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those referring to any third parties,See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009). “ Where the debtor is entitled to see a redacted version”.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you cannot or will not provide a certified copy of any alleged Deed of assignment .
------------------------------
10. Please supply the name of whoever within your corporation has performed due diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under full personal liability.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that there is no one within your corporation who has performed due diligence for your claim on this alleged debt.
-------------------------------
An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgement in commerce.
I now give you ten (10) days to either address the numbered points above in substance. Or rebut point by point each numbered paragraph. Your failure to do so will constitute your acceptance that you have no valid claim against me,and furthermore you will cease and desist any and all claims and correspondence .
I xxxx xxxx Do solemnly swear and affirm that the contents of this affidavit are True,Certain,Correct and Complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed by.
(signature)
All rights reserved
john henry: doe
Authorised agent and representative for JOHN HENRY DOE
Signed in the presence of
( signature of & name of 1st witness)
Of ( witness's address)
As above for 2nd witness
Page 3 of 3
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
.To (name of ceo) Acting in his personal capacity as Chief Executive Officer
Date xxx
Their ref; xxxx
NOTICE-OF-CONDITIONAL-ACCEPTANCE-IN-THE-FORM-OF-AN-AFFIDAVIT.
Fiat Justitia Ruat Caelum : Let Justice Be Done,Though The Heavens Should Fall
(name of ceo). As you have made a claim against me. This is my final Notice of Conditional Acceptance. Please read the following Notice carefully.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce ;Legal Maxim :He who does not deny,admits.
You have on (add the 2 previous dates) been in receipt of my Notices sent via Royal Mail ,tracking nos (add tracking nos)and received by you on (add dates),you were required to gives specific answers to ten (10) questions in order to substantiate your claim against me that I may settle any lawful claim you believe you have against me upon valid proof of claim.You have failed to respond . I have again listed those requests below.
1. Do you hold or have in your possession the alleged agreement signed by myself ?
You have failed to respond or rebut, We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have in your possession the alleged agreement .
.
----------------------------
2. If you hold the original agreement,please forward to me a 'True or certified copy' along with a 'True or certified copy 'of any terms and conditions showing full disclosure and the name of whoever attests to their authenticity.
You have failed to respond or rebut,We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have any original agreement or any Terms and conditions relating to this alleged agreement.
--------------------------------
3. Please confirm that the alleged original agreement (herein call the note) in line with standard banking practices and The Bills of Exchange Act 1882. Is a Negotiable Instrument / Promissory Note / Security /Bill of Exchange.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you cannot confirm the status of the alleged note.
----------------------------------
Page 1 of 3
4. If you have confirmed that paragraph 3 is correct,are you aware that if such 'note' was deposited by myself with xxxx Bank ,then I became a creditor of xxxxBank as per the judgement made by Master of the Rolls Lord Denning who stated in a precedent High Court judgment “We have repeatedly said in this Court that a Bill of Exchange or Promissory Note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary” Lord Denning M.R. In Fielding & Platt Ltd. V Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.I.R.357 at 361;[1969]2 ALL E.R. 150 at 152,CA.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that if any such alleged note was deposited by myself with xxxx Bank ,I became a creditor of xxxx Bank to the face value of any alleged note.
-------------------------------
5. Please confirm that you are aware that if the alleged note was deposited with xxxx Bank,that as per the Bank of England (quarterly bulletin 2014 Q1) xxxx Bank “created money out of thin air” thereby creating a deposit in the banks ledger to the face value of the alleged note,and as such xxxx Bank only created the facility to draw down on said deposit.
You have failed to respond or rebut, We now have a tacit agreement that you are aware that if xxxx Bank performed on an alleged agreement it did nothing more than create and put digits on to a ledger.
-------------------------------------
6. As it is recognised that xxxx Bank created money from thin air,you may wish to obtain clarification from xxxx Bank how they suffered a material loss.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you are aware that xxxx Bank created money from thin air and suffered no material loss.
----------------------------
7. Are you aware that if you have not been provided with the alleged original 'note' from xxxx Bank.It is possible they may have sold or traded it , and as such if it exists it may indeed be located anywhere in the world and any holder in due course would be able to make a claim against me ?
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that unless you hold the aledged 'note' you are unlikely to be the owner of such .This would amount to you making a fraudulent claim against me.
-----------------------------------
8. Please confirm that if you are in possession of the alleged 'note' you will in exchange for full settlement of the alleged debt,return it to me in order that I may personally cancel said 'note'.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you do not have in your possession the alleged 'note' and as such would not be able engage in any transaction pertaining to it.
Page 2 of 3
----------------------------------
9. Please also supply a certified copy of any Deed of Assignment. As per Van Lynn Developments Ltd. V Pelias Construction Ltd.1968[3]All 824. where Lord Denning M.R. stated “ The debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to ensure that the assignee can give good discharge under the contract”. I am prepared to accept a redacted copy with the redactions limited to those referring to any third parties,See also Webster v Ridgeway (2009). “ Where the debtor is entitled to see a redacted version”.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that you cannot or will not provide a certified copy of any alleged Deed of assignment .
------------------------------
10. Please supply the name of whoever within your corporation has performed due diligence and can attest to the accuracy of your claim under full personal liability.
You have failed to respond or rebut. We now have a tacit agreement that there is no one within your corporation who has performed due diligence for your claim on this alleged debt.
-------------------------------
An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgement in commerce.
I now give you ten (10) days to either address the numbered points above in substance. Or rebut point by point each numbered paragraph. Your failure to do so will constitute your acceptance that you have no valid claim against me,and furthermore you will cease and desist any and all claims and correspondence .
I xxxx xxxx Do solemnly swear and affirm that the contents of this affidavit are True,Certain,Correct and Complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed by.
(signature)
All rights reserved
john henry: doe
Authorised agent and representative for JOHN HENRY DOE
Signed in the presence of
( signature of & name of 1st witness)
Of ( witness's address)
As above for 2nd witness
Page 3 of 3
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4984
Join date : 2017-01-17
urchinatheart, LionsShare and Mrblue2015 like this post
Similar topics
» Notice-of-Conditional-Acceptance
» Notice Of Conditional Acceptance / Promissory Notes
» New 3 letters for Debt Purchasers
» Agents of Debt Purchasers - which 3 letters?
» New letter no 1) for debt purchasers - please advise
» Notice Of Conditional Acceptance / Promissory Notes
» New 3 letters for Debt Purchasers
» Agents of Debt Purchasers - which 3 letters?
» New letter no 1) for debt purchasers - please advise
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum