Liability Order in Respect of Council Tax....

Just a quick one, would this be suitable to send? Any additions or omissions recommended please?

The SCIN number they use, what is it... A self-cancelling instalment?

Could the NOTICE: REMOVAL OF IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS be sent to court?
Should a SAR be sent to the court?

Emma Arbuthnot
Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate)
181 Marylebone Road
London
NW1 5BR
DX 120551, Marylebone 9

Regarding Liability Orders dated 24,08,2018
Reference: NI NUMBER
Court 2922

Occupant Executor Office

I, a man, offer a remedy to any verified claims.

I am here in my proper capacity as the Occupant of the Executor Office of the ALL CAPS NAME MR XXXXX XXXXXX Estate.

I require from you, verification of this purported claim.

1. I require to know who the claimant is.

2. I require:
a, A copy of the sworn statement by the (Authorised Assistant to the) Justices' Clerk.
b, Proof of the debt, evidence that the claimant has paid out funds.
c, Accounts showing all payments hitherto made by the claimant on this matter.

3. I require that the Clerk who issued the liability orders provides me with their documentation to show they scrutinised the sworn statement provided by an employee of the claimant, in accordance with Justice Clerks Rules 2005 (S.I.2005 No.545).

4. I require that you cease further actions from any bailiff forthwith. Any persons who trespass will be discharged. NOTICE: REMOVAL OF IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS

5. I require that you tell me how a liability order can be made against a [wo]man who is in full control of maintaining their property.

6. If all of the above requirements are not met within 14 days I demand this matter be dismissed.

SIGNED BY:

THE OCCUPANT EXECUTOR OFFICE


xxxxxx of the xxxxx family

DATE: 11th February 2019

“This lawful notice adds to the Record Of The Parties”

Could the NOTICE: REMOVAL OF IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS be sent to court?
Should a SAR be sent to the court?.=no
send one copy to bailiffs.
place one in a prominent position on the property.
Your notice to the judge will `probably`be ignored, but `hey-ho...check
this out.http://files.meetup.com/3480872/Bangalore_principles.pdf
A little nudge.?
Also you are mixing public,and private law.
ie A man is attempting to converse with an office/dead entity
eg,,dear bla bla I`m writing to you in your private capacity.
or...i`m contacting you in your official office of `TITLE`
S.A.R.whatdotheyknow.com
regards.
pitano1

3INTRODUCTION.The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct identify six core values of the judiciary – Independence, Impartiality, Integrity, Propriety, Equality, Competence and Diligence. They are intended to establish standards of ethical conduct for judges. They are designed to provide guidance to judges in the performance of their judicial duties and to afford the judiciary a framework for regulating judicial conduct. They are also intended to assist members of the executive and the legislature, and lawyers and the public in general, to better understand the judicial role, and to offer the community a standard by which to measure and evaluate the performance of the judicial sector. The Commentary on the Bangalore Principles is intended to contribute to a better understanding of these Principles.The section on “Implementation” in the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct states that: By reason of the nature of judicial office, effective measures shall be adopted by national judiciaries to provide mechanisms to implement these principles if such mechanisms are not already in existence in their jurisdictions.In some jurisdictions mechanisms and procedures are already in existence, having been instituted by law or rules of court, to establish ethical standards of conduct for judges. In others they are not. Accordingly, this statement of measures is offered by the Judicial Integrity Group as guidelines or benchmarks for the effective implementation of the Bangalore Principles. This statement is in two parts. Part One describes the measures that are required to be adopted by the judiciary. Part Two describes the institutional arrangements that are required to ensure judicial independence and which are exclusively within the competence of the State. While judicial independence is in part a state of mind of members of the judiciary, the State is required to establish a set of institutional arrangements that will enable the judge and other relevant office holders to enjoy that state of mind. The protection of the administration of justice from political influence or interference cannot be achieved by the judiciary alone. While it is the responsibility of the judge to be free of inappropriate connections with the executive and the legislature, it is the responsibility of the State to establish the institutional arrangements that would secure the independence of the judiciary from the other two branches of government.
2010.version.
https://www.yargitay.gov.tr/documents/bangaloreetigi.pdf

yeah, nice one pitano, i get what you say.

so,

xxx of family xxx
address
Dear blabla,
The documents received from your court # on the 00/00/00 are addressed to a MR XXX XXX

i require that you tell me who this person is.
signed
xxx of family xxx

not sure that it sounds quite right...i mean, do i care who this person is? any suggestions goodf?

getting a little tired of all this legal BS and it's taking up lots of time to research and lots of mags legislation seems to have been cut...what's it all about!....maybe, just maybe they're on the slippery slope!

cheers

hi. i.t.m
The reason, I posted the info about the Bangalore principles was, to illustrate judges SHOULD be guided by them.

So in your case, that info is quite irrelevant as there is no `proper` court involved. a star chamber [perhaps].

As this scourge on humanity does not directly affect me.[pensioner].
However if such were not the case I would not argue, I would accept the
[so called] debt......upon the condition ofPROOF OF CLAIM


Are the councils subject to V.A.T.?

Well, why not write and ask.?
Although this site deals primarily with P.C.N`S the notices are easily adapted.
http://boevat.org.uk/the-boevat-remedy/

That`s what Iwould do.
best wishes.
pitano1
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

nice one pitano,
he's a character and the sequel is further enlightening

this is the stuff i first heard about...the four doors that are open to us.
and this from the boevat-remedy

Contractual Obligation
For ANY contract to be lawful, INCLUDING A CONTRACT BETWEEN YOURSELF AS PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IN A COURT DE FACTO, it must comprise the following:

FULL DISCLOSURE by both parties. Neither party can later claim 'you should have known' if it was not specifically declared at the time of making the contract.
A CONSIDERATION offered by both parties, this being the subject of the exchange. It must be a sum of money, or an item of value. Both parties agree that their CONSIDERATION is worth (to them) the other party's CONSIDERATION.
LAWFUL TERMS & CONDITIONS for the contract, to which both parties agree.
'Wet' SIGNATURES of both parties. This means hand-written SIGNATURES, as made by two human beings.
Even though businesses and officials act as though there is a lawful contract in place, 99 times out of 100 these rules have not been followed (Maybe it is 999 times out of 1,000 - or even more!).

Standing on these 4 rules, requesting proofs, is the simplest way of stalemating just about every action that may be taken against you.

Copied verbatim from FMOTL.comOpens in a new window with thanks to Veronica: of the family Chapman. FMOTL.com is a great resource for those embarking on the road to freedom; freedom from mental slavery and freedom from what Veronica calls 'The Grand Deception.'

kinda sums it up...if they don't have them all then why are they wasting trees (to help 5G propagate!!!)! And our time?...can we counterclaim if, for example we have asked court for validity of a claim and/or sent a SAR and not received ALL required documents?

cheers

Hi.
I.T.M
regarding your last questions.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/due-diligence
However, if there is something you don`t understand `well`put it
on the forum...that's how we all learn.
best wishes
pitano1

Hi pitano, cheers and good thinking
have posted this https://goodf.forumotion.com/t3344-conditional-acceptance-and-remain-in-honour-counterclaim-but-when#21515

due-diligence...nice one
so much seems to come back to common sense and behaving as a gentleman...like the good old days

With regards to the liability order that i have been discussing here i have posted the letter and reply on this post
https://goodf.forumotion.com/t3294-liability-order-bailiff-called-cms-csa#21766